Cited by 37Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a group-based diet intervention for treating major depression—the HELFIMED trial

Open access
Segal, Leonie, Twizeyemariya, Asterie, Zarnowiecki, Dorota, Niyonsenga, Theo, Bogomolova, Svetlana, Wilson, Amy, O’Dea, Kerin, Parletta, Natalie·2020·Nutritional Neuroscience

Abstract

Background/objectives: Major depression has a negative impact on quality of life, increasing the risk of premature death. It imposes social and economic costs on individuals, families and society. Mental illness is now the leading cause globally of disability/lost quality life and premature mortality. Finding cost-effective treatments for depression is a public health priority. We report an economic evaluation of a dietary intervention for treating major depression.Methods: This economic evaluation drew on the HELFIMED RCT, a 3-month group-based Mediterranean-style diet (MedDiet) intervention (including cooking workshops), against a social group-program for people with major depression. We conducted (i) a cost-utility analysis, utility scores measured at baseline, 3-months and 6-months using the AQoL8D, modelled to 2 years (base case); (ii) a cost-effectiveness analysis, differential cost/case of depression resolved (to normal/mild) measured by the DASS. Differential program costs were calculated from resources use costed in AUD2017. QALYs were discounted at 3.5%pa.Results: Best estimate differential cost/QALY gain per person, MedDiet relative to social group was AUD2775. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, varying costs, utility gain, model period found 95% likelihood cost/QALY less than AUD20,000. Estimated cost per additional case of depression resolved, MedDiet group relative to social group was AUD2,225.Conclusions: A MedDiet group-program for treating major depression was highly cost-effective relative to a social group-program, measured in terms of cost/QALY gain and cost per case of major depression resolved. Supporting access by persons with major depression to group-based dietary programs should be a policy priority. A change to funding will be needed to realise the potential benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1028415x.2018.1556896

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adopting dietary improvement as a treatment strategy for mental health is cost-effective.

    “An added benefit of adopting dietary improvement as a treatment strategy for mental health is its cost-effectiveness, given the compelling economic evaluations of 2 landmark trials investigating the efficacy of a Mediterranean-style dietary intervention on reducing depression symptoms (522, 523).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segal, L., Twizeyemariya, A., Zarnowiecki, D., Niyonsenga, T., Bogomolova, S., Wilson, A., O’Dea, K., & Parletta, N.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Segal, Leonie
Venue
Nutritional Neuroscience
Published
2018-12-20
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
770-778
ISSN
  • 1028-415X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8305
OpenAlex
W2905741234
Cited by
37
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutritional Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (631947)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, Mediterranean diet, dietary intervention, group intervention, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility analysis, quality-adjusted life years, cooking workshops, depression treatment
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Diet Therapy, Humans, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Diet, Mediterranean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review