Cited by 83

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

If-then planning

Bieleke, Maik, Keller, Lucas, Gollwitzer, Peter M.·2021·European Review of Social Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10463283.2020.1808936

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<971::AID-EJSP963>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11031-011-9261-6 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/0146167207311201 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0146167210390523 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00485.x · DOI
  6. Bargh J. A., 1994, Handbook of social cognition, 1
  7. 10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.183 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1080/17437199.2011.560095 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103896 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/bdm.1975 · DOI
  11. Bieleke, M. & Keller, L. (2020). Individual differences in if-then planning: Insights from the development of application of the if-then planning scale (ITPS). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2efnv · DOI
  12. 10.3390/bs9090093 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.003 · DOI
  14. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00736 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.946 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/xap0000072 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/08870440701864538 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206294 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41598-017-10832-x · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.006 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.003 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.06.013 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.006 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/14792779343000059 · DOI
  28. Gollwitzer P. M., 2008, Handbook of motivation science, 325
  29. 10.1007/s11031-014-9416-3 · DOI
  30. Gollwitzer P. M., 2016, Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, 223
  31. Gollwitzer P. M., 2019, The Oxford handbook of human motivation, 247
  32. 10.3390/ijerph17072576 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/10413200109339004 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.08.026 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s00426-014-0549-5 · DOI
  36. 10.1123/tsp.13.2.201 · DOI
  37. Keller L., The handbook of behavior change(pp. 77–88)
  38. 10.1037/13090-002 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/13504620220145401 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1037/mot0000050 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/0956797619868812 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/xge0000344 · DOI
  43. 10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.37 · DOI
  44. 10.1037/hea0000768 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/1088868313501745 · DOI
  46. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/B978-0-12-373694-9.00009-X · DOI
  48. 10.1080/10463283.2011.643698 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Oettingen G., 2014, Rethinking positive thinking: Inside the science of motivation
  50. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.011 · DOI
  51. 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.248 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280bef966 · DOI
  53. 10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1177/1359105315617328 · DOI
  55. Rauch A., 2000, Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 28
  56. 10.1111/bjhp.12032 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Thaler R. H., 2009, Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
  58. Thürmer J. L., 2015, The psychology of planning in organizations: Research and applications, 123
  59. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00603 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/1467-6494.696169 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.10.003 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/ejsp.1963 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1111/bjhp.12230 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/08870446.2014.997730 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.001 · DOI
  66. 10.1080/10463283.2012.718134 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1521/soco.2006.24.6.723 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/s11031-013-9364-3 · DOI
  70. 10.1177/1948550614568158 · DOI
  71. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00395 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.4324/9781315167312-10 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/s41598-018-34009-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bieleke, M., Keller, L., & Gollwitzer, P. M.
Venue
European Review of Social Psychology
Published
2020-12-10
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
88-122
ISSN
  • 1046-3283
  • 1479-277X
Cited by
83
References
17
Language
en
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 1882, FOR 2374, 441551024)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review