Cited by 216Behavioral Health and InterventionsEmotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Effective regulation of affect: An action control perspective on emotion regulation

Open access
Webb, Thomas L., Schweiger Gallo, Inge, Miles, Eleanor, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Sheeran, Paschal·2012·European Review of Social Psychology

Abstract

The present review adopts an action control perspective on emotion regulation, contextualising the gap between emotion control goals (e.g., I want to remain calm) and emotional outcomes (e.g., anger, anxiety, and aggression) in terms of the broader literature on goal pursuit. We propose that failure to effectively regulate emotions can result from difficulties with the self-regulatory tasks of (i) identifying the need to regulate, (ii) deciding whether and how to regulate, and (iii) enacting a regulation strategy. Next we review evidence that a technique traditionally associated with regulating behavioural goals (forming implementation intentions or “if-then” planning) can help to overcome these difficulties. Meta-analysis indicated that forming implementation intentions is effective in modifying emotional outcomes, with a large effect relative to no regulation instructions (k = 21, N = 1306 d + = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.20) and a medium-sized effect relative to goal intention instructions (k = 29, N = 1208, d + = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.65). Our conclusion is that research on emotion regulation might benefit from an action control perspective and the interventions that this perspective offers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10463283.2012.718134

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If-then plans are highly effective in helping people to regulate their emotions (d = .53).

    “Evidence indicates that if-then plans are highly effective in helping people to regulate their emotions ( d = .53 in a meta-analysis by Webb et al., 2012).”

    From Sustaining Attendance at a Mental Health Service: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2018) · cites this paper as Webb et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb, T. L., Schweiger Gallo, I., Miles, E., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Webb, Thomas L.
Venue
European Review of Social Psychology
Published
2012-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
143-186
ISSN
  • 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-277X
OpenAlex
W1992989374
Cited by
216
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/F037449/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotion regulation, action control, implementation intentions, goal pursuit, self-regulation, anger, anxiety, aggression, regulation strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review