Cited by 15Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

How specific is cognitive change? A randomized controlled trial comparing brief cognitive and mindfulness interventions for depression

Hofheinz, Christine, Reder, Maren, Michalak, Johannes·2020·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Objective: There is a debate in psychotherapy research as to whether different kinds of psychotherapy work through specific mechanisms of change. Particularly, it is questioned whether cognitive change is specific to cognitive therapy. This study aimed to answer this question by comparing a brief cognitive intervention with an active comparison intervention (i.e., brief mindfulness-based intervention) and by following strict methodological guidelines. Method: 72 currently depressed outpatients were randomized to either cognitive intervention (n = 39) or mindfulness-based intervention (n = 33). Automatic thoughts (negative self-statements, well-being, and self-confidence), dysfunctional attitudes (performance evaluation and approval by others) and depressive symptoms were assessed before and six times during treatment. Within-person and between-person mediation effects were analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. Results: There was no difference in cognitive change between the interventions. Negative self-statements and performance evaluations were significant mediators of the within-person effect of time on depressive symptoms, while the three other cognitive variables did not change. Conversely, change in depressive symptoms also mediated within-person cognitive change. Conclusion: Cognitive change seems to be a general rather than a specific mechanism of change. However, the mutual impact of cognitive and depressive change does not support a unidirectional causal model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2019.1685138

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hofheinz, C., Reder, M., & Michalak, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hildesheim (DE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Corresponding author
Hofheinz, Christine
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
675-691
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W2985015688
Cited by
15
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive change, mindfulness-based interventions, cognitive therapy, depression, mechanisms of change, automatic thoughts, negative self-statements, performance evaluation, dysfunctional attitudes, mediation, brief psychotherapy, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Brief, Self Concept, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review