Cited by 96Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingDigital Mental Health Interventions

Psychometric properties of internet administered versions of Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS)

Zlomke, Kimberly R.·2009·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.003

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zlomke, K. R.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Zlomke, Kimberly R.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
841-843
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067521483
Cited by
96
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
Penn State Worry Questionnaire, DASS, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, worry, depression, anxiety, stress, online assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review