Cited by 7Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Biased interpretation in perfectionistic concerns: an experimental investigation

Open access
Howell, Joel A., McEvoy, Peter M., Grafton, Ben, Macleod, Colin, Kane, Robert T., Anderson, Rebecca A., Egan, Sarah J.·2019·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Perfectionism is associated with the development and maintenance of several disorders. Given the importance of perfectionism understanding the biased information processes that underpin it is critical. The present study tested the hypothesis that heightened concern over mistakes subscale scores of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale are characterized by a tendency to impose emotionally negative interpretations on perfectionism-relevant situations. METHOD AND DESIGN: Seventy-six non-clinical, general population participants' were presented with interpretations of scenarios where a protagonist was described as achieving well above what was required, but fell short of their own high standard. Using a within-subjects, quasi-experimental design, we assessed interpretations of these scenarios by examining the degree to which participants rated test sentences as being likely implications of the original scenarios. RESULTS: A generalized linear mixed model revealed higher concern over mistakes scores were associated with an increased tendency to rate negative target test sentences as being similar to the original perfectionism-relevant scenarios, and a reduced tendency to rate positive target test sentences as being similar to these original scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide support for the cognitive-behavioral model of perfectionism. These findings support the inclusion of strategies in cognitive-behavioral treatment of perfectionism to reduce interpretation bias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2019.1586888

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other experimental studies using attention and interpretation bias paradigms have found support for the cognitive behavioural model of perfectionism.

    “Other experimental studies using attention and interpretation bias paradigms have also found support for the cognitive behavioural model of perfectionism (Howell et al., 2016, 2019; Tonta et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howell, J. A., McEvoy, P. M., Grafton, B., Macleod, C., Kane, R. T., Anderson, R. A., & Egan, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Howell, Joel A.
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2019-03-07
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
259-269
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2922452702
Cited by
7
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council
  • National Authority for Scientific Research
  • CNCS
  • UEFISCDI
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
perfectionism, interpretation bias, concern over mistakes, Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, cognitive behavioral therapy, emotional interpretation, cognitive distortions
MeSH terms
Perfectionism, Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Observer Variation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review