Cited by 167Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The effects of modifying interpretation bias on worry in generalized anxiety disorder

Hayes, Sarra, Hirsch, Colette R., Krebs, Georgina, Mathews, Andrew·2010·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

This study investigated whether facilitating a benign interpretive bias decreases negative thought intrusions in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Clients were randomly allocated to an interpretation modification condition in which they repeatedly accessed benign meanings of emotionally ambiguous homographs and scenarios, or to a control condition in which they accessed threat and benign meanings with equal frequency. Worry frequency was assessed using a breathing focus task that involved categorising the valence of thought intrusions before and after an instructed worry period. Interpretation bias was assessed during the modification tasks, and on a different measure of interpretation bias (sentence completion) following a period of worry. The experimental procedure modified interpretations made during training, and in the later sentence completion task. Furthermore, compared to the control group, the benign group showed fewer negative thought intrusions during breathing focus (as rated by both participants and an assessor). These findings show that it is possible to induce a more benign interpretive bias in GAD clients and that this reduces negative thought intrusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.10.006

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sample size was calculated a priori to detect effects similar to those observed in previous studies that have used this self-referential worry task.

    “Sample size was calculated a priori to detect effects similar to those observed in previous studies that have used this self-referential worry task (e.g. Hayes et al., 2010: between-group difference on negative thought intrusions at post-test, f2 = 0.43).”
  • The thought intrusions task has been widely used to examine thought intrusions and worry in non-clinical groups, individuals with elevated worry, GAD, and associated conditions.

    “This task has been widely used to examine thought intrusions and worry in non-clinical groups (Krebs, Hirsch, & Mathews, 2010), individuals with elevated worry, and generalized anxiety disorder (Hayes et al., 2010, Hirsch et al., 2009) and associated conditions (i.e. insomnia symptoms, Baker, Baldwin, & Garner, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, S., Hirsch, C. R., Krebs, G., & Mathews, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Hayes, Sarra
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
171-178
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092460488
Cited by
167
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, interpretation bias modification, worry, homographs, sentence completion, cognitive bias modification
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Perception, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review