CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of challenge and threat states on coping flexibility: evidence from framing and exemplar priming

Chen, Luxi, Qu, Li·2023·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
DOI 10.1080/10615806.2022.2059472
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background and objectives Challenge and threat states have divergent effects on cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses. The present research used two experiments to investigate whether challenge and threat states influence coping flexibility differently. Design Study 1 ( N = 93) used loss-framed and gain-framed task instructions to elicit situation-specific threat and challenge evaluations, respectively, with a Null condition as a control. Study 2 ( N = 86) used an online single-session Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I) paradigm to present participants with exemplars related to either positive or negative resolutions of stressful situations to engender a stress-is-a-challenge or stress-is-a-threat mindset, with a mixed condition as a control. Results Loss-framed task instruction generated situation-specific threat evaluation, debilitated effective attention, and reduced positive affect, without altering coping flexibility measured in other scenarios. CBM-I engendered a stress-is-a-challenge mindset and maintained positive affect and coping flexibility, whereas the negative and mixed groups decreased coping flexibility. A stress-is-a-challenge mindset was positively associated with coping flexibility prior to and after exemplar priming. Conclusions Findings enrich the literature on stress coping and shed light on future practice by illustrating the different effects of framing and CBM-I on challenge/threat situation-specific evaluation and stress m…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2022.2059472

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Baddeley A. D., 1986, Working memory
  2. 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00069-1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blascovich J., 2008, Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation, 431
  4. Blascovich J., 2008, Handbook of motivation science, 481
  5. Blascovich J., 2000, Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition, 59
  6. 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60235-X · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chen L., 2021, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 868
  9. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615329 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/1467-6494.695163 · DOI
  11. 10.3758/BF03196772 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Conway A. R. A., 2007, Variation in working memory
  13. Engle R. W., 2004, The psychology of learning and motivation, 44, 145
  14. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.brat.2013.10.008 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/17509840902829331 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.3390/jcm10143122 · DOI
  20. Lazarus R. S., 1984, Stress, appraisal, and coping
  21. 10.1080/02699930143000518 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.381 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mendes W. B., 2014, Advances in motivation science, 233
  24. 10.1080/1612197X.2013.773688 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01449.x · DOI
  26. 10.1123/jsep.35.6.551 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.05.009 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/1049731507314012 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/14792779108401856 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.003 · DOI
  31. 10.1123/jsep.26.2.283 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10578-013-0386-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.004 · DOI
  34. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Chen, L., & Qu, L.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Family and Population Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • School of Social Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
ORCID
Chen, Luxi
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2022-04-08
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
163-183
ISSN
  • 1061-5806
  • 1477-2205
DOI
10.1080/10615806.2022.2059472
Cited by
8
References
19
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review