The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Antioxidant Activity by Using Different In Vitro Methods
Abstract
In this study, six common tests for measuring antioxidant activity were evaluated by comparing four antioxidants and applying them to beverages (tea and juices): Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay (TEAC I-III assay), Total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter assay (TRAP assay), 2,2-diphenyl-l-picrylhydrazyl assay (DPPH assay), N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylendiamine assay (DMPD assay), Photochemiluminescence assay (PCL assay) and Ferric reducing ability of plasma assay (FRAP assay). The antioxidants included gallic acid representing the group of polyphenols, uric acid as the main antioxidant in human plasma, ascorbic acid as a vitamin widely spread in fruits and Trolox as water soluble vitamin E analogue. The six methods presented can be divided into two groups depending on the oxidising reagent. Five methods use organic radical producers (TEAC I-III, TRAP, DPPH, DMPD, PCL) and one method works with metal ions for oxidation (FRAP). Another difference between these tests is the reaction procedure. Three assays use the delay in oxidation and determine the lag phase as parameter for the antioxidant activity (TEAC I, TRAP, PCL). They determine the delay of radical generation as well as the ability to scavenge the radical. In contrast, the assays TEAC II and III, DPPH, DMPD and FRAP analyse the ability to reduce the radical cation (TEAC II and III, DPPH, DMPD) or the ferric ion (FRAP). The three tests acting by radical reduction use preformed radicals and determine the decrease in absorbance while the FRAP assay measures the formed ferrous ions by increased absorbance. Gallic acid was the strongest antioxidant in all tests with exception of the DMPD assay. In contrast, uric acid and ascorbic acid showed low activity in some assays. Most of the assays determine the antioxidant activity in the micromolar range needing minutes to hours. Only one assay (PCL) is able to analyse the antioxidant activity in the nanomolar range. Black currant juice showed highest antioxidant activity in all tests compared to tea, apple juice and tomato juice. Despite these differences, results of these in vitro assays give an idea of the protective efficacy of secondary plant products. It is strongly recommended to use at least two methods due to the differences between the test systems investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965) · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · doi:10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144 · Cited by 24,852
Cited by
Halliwell, B., & Whiteman, M. (2004) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705776 · Cited by 2,238
Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview
Gulcin, İ. (2020) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02689-3 · Cited by 2,205
Review of methods to determine chain-breaking antioxidant activity in food
ROGINSKY, V, & LISSI, E. (2005) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.004 · Cited by 855
Review of methods to determine antioxidant capacities
Karadag, A., Ozcelik, B., & Saner, S. (2009) · Food Analytical Methods · doi:10.1007/s12161-008-9067-7 · Cited by 753
Biological activities and chemical composition of three honeys of different types from Anatolia
Küçük, M., Kolaylı, S., Karaoğlu, Ş., Ulusoy, E., Baltacı, C., & Candan, F. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.10.010 · Cited by 547
In Vitro Methods of Assay of Antioxidants: An Overview
Singh, S., & Singh, R. P. (2008) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559120802304269 · Cited by 182
Roh, M.-K., Uddin, M. S., & Chun, B.-S. (2008) · Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12257-008-0104-6 · Cited by 129
Sakanaka, S., & Ishihara, Y. (2008) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.080 · Cited by 107
El Jemli, M., Kamal, R., Marmouzi, I., Zerrouki, A., Cherrah, Y., & Alaoui, K. (2016) · Advances in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1155/2016/6392656 · Cited by 99
Natural bioactive compounds in carrot waste for food applications and health benefits
(2020) · Studies in natural products chemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819483-6.00009-6 · Cited by 63
Antioxidants and antioxidant activity common eight banana varieties in Kerala
S, S., & P.V, N. (2017) · International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science · doi:10.22161/ijaers.4.7.18 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlesier, K., Harwat, M., Böhm, V., & Bitsch, R.
- Venue
- Free Radical Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-187
- ISSN
- 1029-2470 (ISSN-L)
- 1071-5762
- OpenAlex
- W1986254796
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.