Cited by 100Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationMedia Influence and Health

It's Better to Give Than to Receive: The Role of Social Support, Trust, and Participation on Health-Related Social Networking Sites

Hether, Heather J., Murphy, Sheila T., Valente, Thomas W.·2014·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

Nearly 60% of American adults and 80% of Internet users have sought health information online. Moreover, Internet users are no longer solely passive consumers of online health content; they are active producers as well. Social media, such as social networking sites, are increasingly being used as online venues for the exchange of health-related information and advice. However, little is known about how participation on health-related social networking sites affects users. Research has shown that women participate more on social networking sites and social networks are more influential among same-sex members. Therefore, this study examined how participation on a social networking site about pregnancy influenced members' health-related attitudes and behaviors. The authors surveyed 114 pregnant members of 8 popular pregnancy-related sites. Analyses revealed that time spent on the sites was less predictive of health-related outcomes than more qualitative assessments such as trust in the sites. Furthermore, providing support was associated with the most outcomes, including seeking more information from additional sources and following recommendations posted on the sites. The implications of these findings, as well as directions for future research, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2014.894596

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hether, H. J., Murphy, S. T., & Valente, T. W.
Affiliations
  • University of the Pacific (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Hether, Heather J.
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2014-04-25
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
1424-1439
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2075840520
Cited by
100
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
pregnancy, online health information seeking, social support, trust, online participation, health attitudes and behaviors, women's health, online health advice
MeSH terms
Adult, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Social Support, United States, Trust, Consumer Health Information, Young Adult, Information Seeking Behavior, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review