CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,528Political Conflict and GovernancePolitical Theory and DemocracyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?

Open access
Lührmann, Anna, Lindberg, Staffan I.·2019·Democratization
DOI 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Less than 30 years after Fukuyama and others declared liberal democracy’s eternal dominance, a third wave of autocratization is manifest. Gradual declines of democratic regime attributes characterize contemporary autocratization. Yet, we lack the appropriate conceptual and empirical tools to diagnose and compare such elusive processes. Addressing that gap, this article provides the first comprehensive empirical overview of all autocratization episodes from 1900 to today based on data from the Varieties of Democracy Project (V-Dem). We demonstrate that a third wave of autocratization is indeed unfolding. It mainly affects democracies with gradual setbacks under a legal façade. While this is a cause for concern, the historical perspective presented in this article shows that panic is not warranted: the current declines are relatively mild and the global share of democratic countries remains close to its all-time high. As it was premature to announce the “end of history” in 1992, it is premature to proclaim the “end of democracy” now.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Freedom House, 2008, Freedom in the World
  2. Freedom House, 2008, Freedom in the World
  3. Coppedge M., 2018, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project
  4. Coppedge M., 2018, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute
  5. Dahl R. A., 1998, On Democracy
  6. Diamond L., 2008, Foreign Affairs, 87, 36
  7. Erdmann G., 2011, Comparative Governance and Politics, 1, 21
  8. Lentz H. M., 1999, Encyclopedia of Heads of States and Governnments, 1900 Through 1945
  9. Norris P., 2017, Journal of Democracy (Online Exchange)
  10. Runciman D., 2018, How Democracy Ends
  11. 10.1111/1475-6765.12244 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,528

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Lührmann, Anna
ORCID
Venue
Democratization
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-03-01
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1095-1113
ISSN
  • 1351-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-890X
DOI
10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
OpenAlex
W2919826889
Cited by
1,528
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 273 · 2025: 290 · 2024: 229 · 2023: 206 · 2022: 179 · 2021: 187 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 31
FWCI
266.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Democratization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Research Council (72419)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2018-016114)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
autocratization, democratic backsliding, liberal democracy, end of history, end of democracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review