Cited by 38Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDigital Mental Health Interventions

Outcomes from a pilot online acceptance and commitment therapy program for dementia family caregivers

Fauth, Elizabeth B., Novak, Josh R., Levin, Michael E.·2022·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Objectives Psychosocial and cognitive-behavioral dementia caregiver interventions are effective, yet accessing counselor/therapist-led programs can be costly and difficult. Face-to-face therapist-led Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is highly effective in dementia caregivers, as established by two different randomized control trials. The current study evaluates a pilot ACT for Caregivers program, which is a community-based, self-guided, online adaptation of ACT.Method Participants (N = 51; Mage=66.0 S. D =11.7, 80% women) completed 10 self-guided sessions teaching ACT, along with accessing an online dementia education library.Results Repeated measures ANOVA from pre-, posttest, and 4-week follow-up demonstrated decreased depressive symptoms, burden, and stress reactions to behavioral symptoms, and increased positive aspects of caregiving and quality of life. ACT-specific measures improved, with decreases in cognitive fusion and psychological inflexibility (AAQ-II), and improvements in living according to personal values (ValuingProgress increased; ValuingObstruction decreased). All outcomes were statistically significant (at p < .01) and sustained over 4-week follow-up. Although this was a non-clinical sample, the program demonstrated clinical significance, as average depressive symptoms were at the clinical cutoff at baseline, but one standard deviation below clinical cut-off at post-test and 4-week followup. Use of education materials was low (29% of participants used these, albeit rating them helpful), suggesting that ACT likely contributed more to overall improvements.Conclusion The online ACT for Caregivers pilot program offers an empirically supported translation of traditional ACT, improving accessibility, and affordability for family dementia caregivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2021.1942432

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fauth, E. B., Novak, J. R., & Levin, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Fauth, Elizabeth B.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2021-07-07
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1620-1629
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W3178061155
Cited by
38
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Utah State University Extension
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, dementia caregivers, online intervention, caregiver depression, caregiver burden, behavioral symptoms, quality of life, cognitive fusion, psychological inflexibility, values-based living, dementia education
MeSH terms
Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Caregivers, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review