Cited by 219SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Impact of the delta variant on vaccine efficacy and response strategies

Open access
Bian, Lianlian, Gao, Qiushuang, Gao, Fan, Wang, Qian, He, Qian, Wu, Xing, Mao, Qunying, Xu, Miao +1 more·2021·Expert Review of Vaccines

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 has caused a new wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in many countries. It is the most infectious variant of SARS-CoV-2 to date, and its high infectivity means that a higher proportion of the population needs to be vaccinated to reduce the disease burden, which poses a substantial public health challenge. AREAS COVERED: The evolution of the Delta variant is reviewed, including an overview of the Delta Plus variant with a K417N mutation in the RBD, which may confer an improved immune evasion ability. Decreases in serum neutralizing antibody titers after vaccination against Delta were greater than those against Alpha but less than those against Beta. The protective efficacy of existing vaccines against the Delta variant have declined and is related to the number of doses and the time since vaccination. EXPERT OPINION: The currently used vaccines are effective against hospitalization/severe disease due to the Delta variant. Accelerating the popularization of vaccination, improving the coverage rate, and the implementation of intervention measures, such as wearing masks, are effective means to control the spread of the Delta variant and other variants. However, vaccination alone against SARS-CoV-2 without intervention measures may lead to continuous spread and the emergence of new variants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14760584.2021.1976153

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Mlcochova P, Kemp S, Dhar MS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 Delta variant emergence, replication and sensitivity to neutralising antibodies. bioRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.05.08.443253. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Nasreen S, Chung H, He S, et al. Effectiveness of SARS-COV-2 vaccines against variants of concern in Ontario, Canada. medRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.06.28.21259420. •• Real-world data from Canada indicated the efficacies of the BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1 vaccines against VOCs. · DOI
  3. Sapkal GN, Yadav PD, Sahay RR, et al. Neutralization of Delta variant with sera of Covishield vaccinees and SARS-COV-2 recovered vac- cinated individuals. bioRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.07.01.450676. · DOI
  4. Barouch DH, Stephenson KE, Sadoff J, et al. Durable humoral and cellular immune responses following Ad26.COV2.S vaccination for SARS-COV-2. medRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.07.05.21259918. · DOI
  5. Vacharathit V, Aiewsakun P, Manopwisedjaroen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern exhibit reduced sensitivity to live-virus neutraliza- tion in sera from CoronaVac vaccinees and naturally infected SARS-COV-2 patients. medRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/ 2021.07.10.21260232. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bian, L., Gao, Q., Gao, F., Wang, Q., He, Q., Wu, X., Mao, Q., Xu, M., & Liang, Z.
Affiliations
National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN)
Corresponding author
Liang, Zhenglun
Venue
Expert Review of Vaccines
Published
2021-09-09
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
1201-1209
ISSN
  • 1476-0584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8395
OpenAlex
W3197480610
Cited by
219
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 21
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Vaccines (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key R&D Program of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
Delta variant, vaccine efficacy, neutralizing antibodies, immune evasion, breakthrough infection, vaccination coverage, masking
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Antibodies, Viral, Hospitalization, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Vaccination, Immune Evasion, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review