Cited by 113Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Diagnostic function of the neuroinflammatory biomarker YKL-40 in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases

Baldacci, Filippo, Lista, Simone, Cavedo, Enrica, Bonuccelli, Ubaldo, Hampel, Harald·2017·Expert Review of Proteomics

Abstract

Introduction Neuroinflammation is a crucial mechanism in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases pathophysiology. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) YKL-40 - an indicator of microglial activation - has recently been identified by proteomic studies as a candidate biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Areas covered: We review the impact of CSF YKL-40 as a pathophysiological biomarker for AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. CSF YKL-40 concentrations have been shown to predict progression from prodromal mild cognitive impairment to AD dementia. Moreover, a positive association between CSF YKL-40 and other biomarkers of neurodegeneration - particularly total tau protein - has been reported during the asymptomatic preclinical stage of AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. Albeit preliminary, current data do not support an association between APOE-ε4 status and CSF YKL-40 concentrations. When interpreting the diagnostic/prognostic significance of CSF YKL-40 concentrations in neurodegenerative diseases, potential confounders - including age, metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors, diagnostic criteria for selecting cases/controls - need to be considered. Expert opinion/commentary: CSF YKL-40 represents a pathophysiological biomarker reflecting immune/inflammatory mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases, associated with tau protein pathology. Besides being associated with tau pathology, CSF YKL-40 adds to the growing array of biomarkers reflecting distinct molecular brai…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14789450.2017.1304217

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldacci, F., Lista, S., Cavedo, E., Bonuccelli, U., & Hampel, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Hampel, Harald
Venue
Expert Review of Proteomics
Published
2017-03-20
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
285-299
ISSN
  • 1478-9450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8387
OpenAlex
W2591661570
Cited by
113
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Proteomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AXA Research Fund (ANR-10-IAIHU-06)
  • Investissements d’avenir (ANR-10-IAIHU-06)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
YKL-40, Alzheimer's disease, neuroinflammation, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, microglial activation, tau protein, mild cognitive impairment, prodromal Alzheimer's disease, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, neurodegenerative diseases, anti-inflammatory therapy, precision medicine
MeSH terms
Chitinase-3-Like Protein 1, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Inflammation, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, tau Proteins, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review