Cited by 1,088Media Influence and HealthNarrative Theory and AnalysisFlow Experience in Various Fields

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Narrative Engagement

Open access
Busselle, Rick, Bilandzic, Helena·2009·Media Psychology

Abstract

Research indicates that the extent to which one becomes engaged, transported, or immersed in a narrative influences the narrative's potential to affect subsequent story-related attitudes and beliefs. Explaining narrative effects and understanding the mechanisms responsible depends on our ability to measure narrative engagement in a theoretically meaningful way. This article develops a scale for measuring narrative engagement that is based on a mental models approach to narrative processing. It distinguishes among four dimensions of experiential engagement in narratives: narrative understanding, attentional focus, emotional engagement, and narrative presence. The scale is developed and validated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with data from viewers of feature film and television, in different viewing situations, and from two different countries. The scale's ability to predict enjoyment and story-consistent attitudes across different programs is presented. Implications for conceptualizing engagement with narratives as well as narrative persuasion and media effects are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15213260903287259

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1026//1617-6383.14.4.149 · DOI
  2. Arbuckle J., 1999, AMOS 4.0 user's guide.
  3. Bilandzic, H. and Busselle, R. 2008. Attention and narrative engagement: Divergences in secondary task reaction times and self-reports of narrative engagement . Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
  4. Biocca F, 2002, Narrative impact. social and cognitive foundations, 97
  5. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_4 · DOI
  6. 10.1207/s1532785xmep0604_1 · DOI
  7. Brown T, 2006, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research.
  8. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x · DOI
  9. Csikszentmihalyi M, 1990, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.
  10. Csikszentmihalyi M, 1997, Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life.
  11. 10.1086/510216 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fisher W. R., 1987, Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value and action.
  14. Fiske S. T., 1991, Social cognition.
  15. Galbraith M, 1995, Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective, 19
  16. Gerrig R. J., 1993, Experiencing narrative worlds., 10.12987/9780300159240 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107 · DOI
  18. Graesser A. C., 2002, Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations, 229
  19. 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5 · DOI
  20. Green M. C., 2002, Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations, 315
  21. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x · DOI
  22. Green M. C., 2004, The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion, 161
  23. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02914.x · DOI
  24. Kim T., 1997, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3
  25. Lombard M., 1997, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3
  26. 10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_5 · DOI
  27. Nunnally J. C., 1994, Psychometric theory,
  28. Ohler P, 1994, Kognitive Filmpsychologie. Verarbeitung und mentale Repräsentation narrativer Filme [Cogitive psychology of film: Processing and mental representation of narrative films]
  29. Oliver M. B., 2003, Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann, 85
  30. 10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_3 · DOI
  31. 10.1086/209304 · DOI
  32. 10.1515/comm.2004.022 · DOI
  33. 10.1017/CCOL0521856965.002 · DOI
  34. Segal E. M., 1995, Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective, 61
  35. Segal E. M., 1995, Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective, 3
  36. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00318.x · DOI
  37. Slater M. D., 2002, Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations., 157
  38. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x · DOI
  39. Tabachnick B., 2007, Using multivariate statistics,
  40. 10.1177/00131649921969938 · DOI
  41. van Dijk T. A., 1983, Strategies of discourse comprehension.
  42. Viswanathan M, 2005, Measurement error and research design., 10.4135/9781412984935 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0304-422X(94)00020-7 · DOI
  44. Zubin D. A., 1995, Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective, 129
  45. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 909

Metadata

Authors
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Venue
Media Psychology
Published
2009-11-23
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
321-347
ISSN
  • 1521-3269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-785X
OpenAlex
W2062865797
Cited by
1,088
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
FWCI
311.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Media Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
Keywords
narrative engagement, narrative persuasion, scale development, mental models, narrative comprehension, attentional focus, emotional engagement, narrative presence, media influence, narrative enjoyment, cross-cultural validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review