Cited by 49Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness and Cost Offset Analysis of Group CBT for Hypochondriasis Delivered in a Psychiatric Setting: An Open Trial

Hedman, Erik, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Andersson, Erik, Rück, Christian, Andersson, Gerhard, Lindefors, Nils·2010·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Hypochondriasis is highly prevalent in medical settings, has detrimental effects for affected individuals, and is associated with high societal costs. Although cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of hypochondriasis, it is not widely available because of a lack of properly trained therapists. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate therapy forms that require less therapist time. The authors investigated the effect and economic impact of group CBT delivered in a psychiatric setting among 24 people with hypochondriasis. A within-group design with prolonged baseline was used, and all participants received 10 weeks of group-based treatment. The primary outcome measures were the Health Anxiety Inventory and the Illness Attitude Scales. Results indicate significant improvement on both measures at posttreatment and 6-month follow-up (Cohen's d = 1.03-1.72). Medical and nonmedical costs were substantially lowered. The authors conclude that group-based CBT delivered in a psychiatric setting is an effective and potentially highly cost-effective treatment for hypochondriasis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2010.496460

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Andersson, E., Rück, C., Andersson, G., & Lindefors, N.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2010-12
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
239-250
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W1998466339
Cited by
49
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Trimbos-instituut
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
health anxiety, group cognitive behavioral therapy, cost-effectiveness, psychiatric treatment, attitudes toward illness, health care costs
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Personality Inventory, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review