Cited by 103Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Internet-delivered exposure-based cognitive–behavioural therapy and behavioural stress management for severe health anxiety: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Hedman, Erik, Axelsson, Erland, Görling, Anders, Ritzman, Carina, Ronnheden, Markus, Alaoui, Samir El, Andersson, Erik, Lekander, Mats +1 more·2014·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Exposure-based cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered via the internet has been shown to be effective for severe health anxiety (hypochondriasis) but has not been compared with an active, effective and credible psychological treatment, such as behavioural stress management (BSM). Aims: To investigate two internet-delivered treatments – exposure-based CBT v.BSM – for severe health anxiety in a randomised controlled trial (trial registration: NCT01673035). Method: Participants (n= 158) with a principal diagnosis of severe health anxiety were allocated to 12 weeks of exposure-based CBT (n= 79) or BSM (n= 79) delivered via the internet. The Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI) was the primary outcome. Results: Internet-delivered exposure-based CBT led to a significantly greater improvement on the HAI compared with BSM. However, both treatment groups made large improvements on the HAI (pre-to-post-treatment Cohen's d: exposure-based CBT, 1.78; BSM, 1.22). Conclusions: Exposure-based CBT delivered via the internet is an efficacious treatment for severe health anxiety. Declarations of interest: None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.140913

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) (DSM-IV). APA, 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedman, E., Axelsson, E., Görling, A., Ritzman, C., Ronnheden, M., Alaoui, S. E., Andersson, E., Lekander, M., & Ljótsson, B.
Affiliations
Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-10
Volume
205
Issue
4
Pages
307-314
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2100297997
Cited by
103
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
health anxiety, online therapy, treatment efficacy comparison
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Counseling, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review