Cited by 212Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for severe health anxiety: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Hedman, Erik, Andersson, Gerhard, Andersson, Erik, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Rück, Christian, Asmundson, Gordon J. G., Lindefors, Nils·2011·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Hypochondriasis, characterised by severe health anxiety, is a common condition associated with functional disability. Cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective but not widely disseminated treatment for hypochondriasis. Internet-based CBT, including guidance in the form of minimal therapist contact via email, could be a more accessible treatment, but no study has investigated internet-based CBT for hypochondriasis. Aims: To investigate the efficacy of internet-based CBT for hypochondriasis. Method: A randomised controlled superiority trial with masked assessment comparing internet-based CBT ( n = 40) over 12 weeks with an attention control condition ( n = 41) for people with hypochondriasis. The primary outcome measure was the Health Anxiety Inventory. This trial is registrated with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00828152). Results: Participants receiving internet-based CBT made large and superior improvements compared with the control group on measures of health anxiety (between-group Cohen's d range 1.52–1.62). Conclusions: Internet-based CBT is an efficacious treatment for hypochondriasis that has the potential to increase accessibility and availability of CBT for hypochodriasis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.086843

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]25. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders: Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). Biometrics Research, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedman, E., Andersson, G., Andersson, E., Ljótsson, B., Rück, C., Asmundson, G. J. G., & Lindefors, N.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Regina (CA)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-03
Volume
198
Issue
3
Pages
230-236
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2102870587
Cited by
212
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
25.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
health anxiety, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, online therapy, treatment accessibility, Health Anxiety Inventory
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review