Cited by 120Behavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Health behaviour change in cardiovascular disease prevention and management: meta-review of behaviour change techniques to affect self-regulation

Open access
Suls, Jerry, Mogavero, Jazmin N., Falzon, Louise, Pescatello, Linda S., Hennessy, Emily A., Davidson, Karina W.·2020·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Self-regulation processes assume a major role in health behaviour theory and are postulated as important mechanisms of action in behavioural interventions to improve health prevention and management. The need to better understand mechanisms of behaviour change interventions for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) called for conducting a meta-review of meta-analyses for interventions targeting self-regulation processes. The protocol, preregistered on Open Science Framework (OSF), found 15 eligible meta-analyses, published between 2006 and August 2019, which quantitatively assessed the role of self-regulatory mechanisms and behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Quality of the meta-analyses varied widely according to AMSTAR-2 criteria. Several BCTs, assumed to engage self-regulatory mechanisms, were unevenly represented in CVD meta-analytic reviews. Self-monitoring, the most frequently studied self-regulatory BCT, seemed to improve health behaviour change and health outcomes but these results merit cautious interpretation. Findings for other self-regulatory BCTs were less promising. No studies in the CVD domain directly tested engagement of self-regulation processes. A general challenge for this area stems from reliance on post-hoc tests of the effects of BCTs in multiple-component interventions. Recent advances in BCT taxonomies and the experimental medicine approach to engaging self-regulation mechanisms, however, provide opportunities to improve CVD prevention and management behavioural interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2019.1691622

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavior change strategies include behavioral self-regulatory skills such as goal setting, activity planning, adaptive problem solving, the provision of feedback, and self-monitoring, all of which overlap with key elements of traditional CBT.

    “Behavior change strategies include behavioral self-regulatory skills such as goal setting, activity planning (including behavioral activation), adaptive problem solving, the provision of feedback, and self-monitoring (86), all of which overlap with key elements of traditional CBT.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ, Berbaum ML, & Campbell RT (2009). Modeling mood variation associated with smoking: An application of a heterogeneous mixed-effects model for analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data. Addiction, 104(2), 297– 307. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02435. 19149827 PMC2629640 · DOI
  2. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, & Nathan DM, Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. (2002). Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. New England Journal of Medicine 346(6): 393– 403. doi: 10.1056/NEJ012512 11832527 PMC1370926 · DOI
  3. Mullen PD, Mains DA, & Velez R (1992). A meta-analysis of controlled trials of cardiac patient education. Patient Education and Counseling, 19(2), 143– 162. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(92)9 1299819 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suls, J., Mogavero, J. N., Falzon, L., Pescatello, L. S., Hennessy, E. A., & Davidson, K. W.
Affiliations
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Suls, Jerry
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2019-11-29
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
43-65
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W2983135385
Cited by
120
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 4
FWCI
21.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U24AG052175)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
behaviour change techniques, self-regulation, cardiovascular disease prevention, cardiovascular care, health behavior change, self-monitoring, BCT taxonomy
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Behavior Therapy, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Health Behavior, Disease Management, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review