Cited by 69Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Genetic nature or genetic nurture? Introducing social genetic parameters to quantify bias in polygenic score analyses

Trejo, Sam, Domingue, Benjamin W.·2018·Biodemography and Social Biology

Abstract

Results from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) can be used to generate a polygenic score (PGS), an individual-level measure summarizing identified genetic influence on a trait dispersed across the genome. For complex, behavioral traits, the association between an individual's PGS and their phenotype may contain bias (from geographic, ancestral, and/or socioeconomic confounding) alongside the causal effect of the individual's genes. We formalize the introduction of a different source of bias in regression models using PGSs: the effects of parental genes on offspring outcomes, known as genetic nurture. GWAS do not discriminate between the various pathways through which genes become associated with outcomes, meaning existing PGSs capture both direct genetic effects and genetic nurture effects. We construct a theoretical model for genetic effects and show that the presence of genetic nurture biases PGS coefficients from both naïve OLS (between-family) and family fixed effects (within-family) regressions. This bias is in opposite directions; while naïve OLS estimates are biased away from zero, family fixed effects estimates are biased toward zero. We quantify this bias using two novel parameters: (1) the genetic correlation between the direct and nurture effects and (2) the ratio of the SNP heritabilities for the direct and nurture effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19485565.2019.1681257

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trejo, S., & Domingue, B. W.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Trejo, Sam
Venue
Biodemography and Social Biology
Published
2018-10-02
Volume
64
Issue
3-4
Pages
187-215
ISSN
  • 1948-5565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5573
OpenAlex
W2996316818
Cited by
69
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biodemography and Social Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
polygenic risk score, genetic nurture, direct genetic effects, family fixed effects, genetic correlation, SNP heritability
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Bias, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review