Cited by 93Mental Health Treatment and AccessSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Can we reduce the burden of depression? The Australian experience with beyondblue: The national depression initiative

Hickie, Ian·2004·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Throughout the Asia Pacific region, there is an urgent need to reduce the burden of depression by increasing depression awareness, reducing stigma and dismantling those social barriers that prevent full participation by people with depression. This paper describes the development and early achievements of the Australian depression initiative, beyondblue. METHODS: A review of the key priorities of beyondblue and their impacts during the first three years of operation (2001-03). RESULTS: Key achievements include: the degree of national recognition of beyondblue; size and scope of media impact; growth in website utilisation; increased reporting of the community's recognition of people with depression; genuine reforms in life insurance and income protection; development of a new national consumer and carer organisation; establishment of major population-based preventative and early intervention programs; system-wide reform of primary care-based mental health services; national educational program uptake by general practitioners; and, development of key awareness and intervention programs for use in schools and the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: In its first three years of operation, beyondblue has had a major impact on depression awareness in Australia and demonstrable gains have been made in reducing stigma and major social barriers. A pre-existing national mental health policy and implementation plan, a substantial funding base and participation by key political, media and community leaders have been essential elements of its short-term success. Its longer-term impact will now depend on more sustainable community and business partnerships as well as the growth of a more influential consumer and carer voice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/j.1039-8562.2004.02097.x-2

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickie, I.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Hickie, Ian
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2004-10
Volume
12
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
S38-S46
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2132911793
Cited by
93
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
depression, depression stigma, depression awareness, mental health policy, primary care mental health services, prevention and early intervention, income protection, media campaigns, school-based intervention, workplace mental health, Australia
MeSH terms
Australia, Awareness, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depressive Disorder, Forecasting, Health Education, Health Promotion, Health Surveys, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Prejudice, Primary Health Care, Public Opinion, Program Evaluation, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review