The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postprandial Metabolic Profiles Following Meals and Snacks Eaten during Simulated Night and Day Shift Work
Abstract
Shift workers are known to have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with day workers. An important factor contributing to this increased risk could be the increased incidence of postprandial metabolic risk factors for CVD among shift workers, as a consequence of the maladaptation of endogenous circadian rhythms to abrupt changes in shift times. We have previously shown that both simulated and real shift workers showed relatively impaired glucose and lipid tolerance if a single test meal was consumed between 00:00-02:00 h (night shift) compared with 12:00-14:00 h (day shift). The objective of the present study was to extend these observations to compare the cumulative metabolic effect of consecutive snacks/meals, as might normally be consumed throughout a period of night or day shift work. In a randomized crossover study, eight healthy nonobese men (20-33 yrs, BMI 20-25kg/m2) consumed a combination of two meals and a snack on two occasions following a standardized prestudy meal, simulating night and day shift working (total energy 2500 kcal: 40% fat, 50% carbohydrate, 10% protein). Meals were consumed at 01:00/ 13:00 h and 07:00/19:00h, and the snack at 04:00/16:00 h. Blood was taken after an overnight fast, and for 8 h following the first meal on each occasion, for the measurement of glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol (TAG), and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA). RM-ANOVA (factors time and shift) showed a significant effect of shift for plasma TAG, with higher levels on simulated night compared to day shift (p < 0.05). There was a trend toward an effect of shift for plasma glucose, with higher plasma glucose at night (p = 0.08), and there was a time-shift interaction for plasma insulin levels (p < 0.01). NEFA levels were unaffected by shift. Inspection of the area under the plasma response curve (AUC) following each meal and snack revealed that the differences in lipid tolerance occurred throughout the study, with greatest differences occurring following the mid-shift snack. In contrast, glucose tolerance was relatively impaired following the first night-time meal, with no differences observed following the second meal. Plasma insulin levels were significantly lower following the first meal (p < 0.05), but significantly higher following the second meal (p < 0.01) on the simulated night shift. These findings confirm our previous observations of raised postprandial TAG and glucose at night, and show that sequential meal ingestion has a more pronounced effect on subsequent lipid than carbohydrate tolerance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The researchers reported that integrated glucose (statistical trend) and triglyceride levels were higher across the night shift than day shift.”
From The impact of the circadian timing system on cardiovascular and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as Al-Naimi et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“Integrated insulin levels were not different between the night shift and day shifts.”
From The impact of the circadian timing system on cardiovascular and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as Al-Naimi et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Role of Insulin Resistance in Human Disease
Reaven, G. M. (1988) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.37.12.1595 · Cited by 12,154
Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function
Spiegel, K., Leproult, R., & Van Cauter, E. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01376-8 · Cited by 3,668
Hokanson, J. E., & Austin, M. A. (1996) · Journal of Cardiovascular Risk · doi:10.1097/00043798-199604000-00014 · Cited by 1,706
Karlsson, B., Knutsson, A., & Lindahl, B. (2001) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.58.11.747 · Cited by 924
Roles of Circadian Rhythmicity and Sleep in Human Glucose Regulation
Cauter, E. V., Polonsky, K. S., & Scheen, A. J. (1997) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.18.5.0317 · Cited by 632
Prospective study of shift work and risk of coronary heart disease in women
Kawachi, I., Colditz, G. A., Stampfer, M. J., Willett, W. C., Manson, J. E., Speizer, F. E., & Hennekens, C. H. (1995) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3178 · Cited by 524
Increased risk of ischaemic heart disease in shift workers
Knutsson, A., Jonsson, B., Akerstedt, T., & Orth-Gomer, K. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91619-3 · Cited by 459
Ethical Principles and Standards for the Conduct of Human and Animal Biological Rhythm Research
Touitou, Y., Portaluppi, F., Smolensky, M. H., & Rensing, L. (2004) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.1081/cbi-120030045 · Cited by 367
Kristensen, T. S. (1989) · Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1854 · Cited by 301
Radioimmunoassay for 6-Sulphatoxymelatonin in Urine Using an Iodinated Tracer
Aldhous, M., & Arendt, J. (1988) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/000456328802500319 · Cited by 226
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Van Cauter E., 1997, Endocrin. Rev., 18, 716
- Van Cauter E., 1992, Am. J. Physiol., 262, E467
Cited by
Sorted by citations
St-Onge, M.-P., Ard, J., Baskin, M. L., Chiuve, S. E., Johnson, H. M., Kris-Etherton, P., & Varady, K. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000476 · Cited by 728
Biological Clocks and Shift Work: Circadian Dysregulation and Potential Long-term Effects
Haus, E. L., & Smolensky, M. H. (2006) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-005-9015-4 · Cited by 399
Arendt, J. (2006) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.1080/07420520500464361 · Cited by 383
Olsen, G. W., & Zobel, L. R. (2007) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-007-0213-0 · Cited by 307
Health Consequences of Circadian Disruption in Humans and Animal Models
Evans, J. A., & Davidson, A. J. (2013) · Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396971-2.00010-5 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Naimi, S., Hampton, S. M., Richard, P., Tzung, C., & Morgan, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Morgan, L. M.
- Venue
- Chronobiology International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 937-947
- ISSN
- 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-6073
- OpenAlex
- W2024469365
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
- Keywords
- shift work, night shift work, day shift, postprandial metabolism, glucose tolerance, triglycerides, free fatty acids, insulin, circadian rhythm, cardiovascular risk, snacks, meals, area under the curve, metabolic risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biological Clocks, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Circadian Rhythm, Eating, Fatty Acids, Humans, Insulin, Male, Triglycerides, Work Schedule Tolerance, Diet Records, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review