Cited by 675Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Egalitarian Behavior and Reverse Dominance Hierarchy [and Comments and Reply]

Boehm, Christopher, Barclay, Harold B., Dentan, Robert Knox, Dupre, Marie-Claude, Hill, Jonathan D., Kent, Susan, Knauft, Bruce M., Otterbein, Keith F. +1 more·1993·Current Anthropology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/204166

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some human societies a coalition of the majority prevents any individuals from dominating access to preferred resources, and there are no alpha males (reverse dominance hierarchy).

    “In some societies a coalition of the majority is able to prevent any individuals from dominating access to preferred resources (Boehm, 1999). In these cases, called a “reverse dominancy hierarchy” or “counter-hierarchy” there are no alpha males (Boehm, 1993).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boehm, C., Barclay, H. B., Dentan, R. K., Dupre, M.-C., Hill, J. D., Kent, S., Knauft, B. M., Otterbein, K. F., & Rayner, S.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
1993-06
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
227-254
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2292785510
Cited by
675
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 51
FWCI
32.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
egalitarianism, dominance hierarchy, social hierarchy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review