Cited by 210Child Abuse and TraumaFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Childhood Stress and Family Environment

Flinn, Mark V., England, Barry G.·1995·Current Anthropology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/204444

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variations in parental care associate with individual differences in neuroendocrine and autonomic responses to stress in humans and with emotional reactivity.

    “Likewise, variations in parental care associate with individual differences in neuroendocrine and autonomic responses to stress in humans as well as emotional reactivity.18,33-36”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flinn, M. V., & England, B. G.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
1995-12
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
854-866
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2014024964
Cited by
208
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
childhood stress, family environment, child development, family relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review