The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm
Abstract
This paper attempts to explain how the separation of security ownership and control, typical of large corporations, can be an efficient form of economic organization. We first set aside the presumption that a corporation has owners in any meaningful sense. The entrepreneur is also laid to rest, at least for the purposes of the large modern corporation. The two functions usually attributed to the entrepreneur--management and risk bearing--are treated as naturally separate factors within the set of contracts called a firm. The firm is disciplined by competition from other firms, which forces the evolution of devides for efficiently monitoring the performance of the entire team and of its individual members. Individual participants in the firm, and in particular its managers, face both the discipline and opportunities provided by the markets for their services, both within and outside the firm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Cited by
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
The Provision of Incentives in Firms
Prendergast, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.7 · Cited by 3,338
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins
Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.46.2.285 · Cited by 3,220
Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective
Holmstrom, B. (1999) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00083 · Cited by 3,172
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
Jarillo, J. C. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104 · Cited by 2,555
The New Economics of Organization
Moe, T. M. (1984) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110997 · Cited by 1,974
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
Bergen, M., Dutta, S., & Walker, O. C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299205600301 · Cited by 1,105
Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy
Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhu082 · Cited by 1,020
The impact of information systems on organizations and markets
Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/99977.99990 · Cited by 960
Substitutes or Complements? A Configurational Examination of Corporate Governance Mechanisms
Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0728 · Cited by 771
Role of Managerial Incentives and Discretion in Hedge Fund Performance
AGARWAL, V., DANIEL, N. D., & NAIK, N. Y. (2009) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01499.x · Cited by 688
CEO Compensation and Board Structure
CHHAOCHHARIA, V., & GRINSTEIN, Y. (2009) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01433.x · Cited by 611
Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101941 · Cited by 521
Gifts as Economic Signals and Social Symbols
Camerer, C. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228946 · Cited by 372
Commitment to social good and insider trading
Gao, F., Lisic, L. L., & Zhang, I. X. (2014) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.03.001 · Cited by 375
Optimal Managerial Contracts and Equilibrium Security Prices
Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1982) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2327326 · Cited by 286
Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., & Lubatkin, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00714.x · Cited by 206
Toward a theory of evidence based decision making
Baba, V. V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211227546 · Cited by 167
Markets as institutions versus organizations as markets? Disentangling some fundamental concepts
Ménard, C. (1995) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(95)00030-5 · Cited by 140
Beyond primacy: a stakeholder theory of corporate governance
Stoelhorst, J. W., & Vishwanathan, P. (2024) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0268 · Cited by 117
Appuhami, R., & Bhuyan, M. (2015) · Managerial Auditing Journal · doi:10.1108/maj-04-2014-1022 · Cited by 100
Intellectual capital and corporate governance: an evaluation of Oman's financial sector companies
Dalwai, T., & Mohammadi, S. S. (2020) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-09-2018-0151 · Cited by 87
Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Rahman, I., & Noor, A. (2018) · World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1108/wjstsd-11-2016-0062 · Cited by 78
What Corporate Governance Can Learn from Catholic Social Teaching
Cremers, M. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3127-5 · Cited by 41
Want better business theories? Maybe Karl Popper has the answer
Shareff, R. (2007) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2007.25223466 · Cited by 39
Rahman, H. U., & Zahid, M. (2021) · Gender in Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/gm-12-2019-0252 · Cited by 36
A multi-perspective framework for research on (sustainable) autonomous systems
Beck, R., Dibbern, J., & Wiener, M. (2022) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-022-00752-0 · Cited by 23
Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspective
Gabison, G. A., & Xian, R. P. (2025) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.realm-1.9 · Cited by 19
Freiburg, M., & Grichnik, D. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2013.791295 · Cited by 16
How Does Corporate Governance Affect Equity Volatility? Worldwide Evidence and Theory
Gagnon, L., & Jeanneret, A. (2025) · The Review of Corporate Finance Studies · doi:10.1093/rcfs/cfad002 · Cited by 8
A Review of Corporate Reporting Transparency Quality: Current Status and Future Directions
Hewage, Y. M., Cooray, A., & Ahmed, R. (2026) · Australian Accounting Review · doi:10.1111/auar.70019 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Fama, E. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1980-04
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 288-307
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2160184254
- Cited by
- 10,466
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 227.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.