Cited by 133Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: fine mapping supports linkage to 5p13, 6q12, 16p13, and 17p11

Open access
Ogdie, Matthew N., Fisher, Simon E., Yang, May, Ishii, Janeen, Francks, Clyde, Loo, Sandra K., Cantor, Rita M., McCracken, James T. +3 more·2004·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

We completed fine mapping of nine positional candidate regions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an extended population sample of 308 affected sibling pairs (ASPs), constituting the largest linkage sample of families with ADHD published to date. The candidate chromosomal regions were selected from all three published genomewide scans for ADHD, and fine mapping was done to comprehensively validate these positional candidate regions in our sample. Multipoint maximum LOD score (MLS) analysis yielded significant evidence of linkage on 6q12 (MLS 3.30; empiric P=.024) and 17p11 (MLS 3.63; empiric P=.015), as well as suggestive evidence on 5p13 (MLS 2.55; empiric P=.091). In conjunction with the previously reported significant linkage on the basis of fine mapping 16p13 in the same sample as this report, the analyses presented here indicate that four chromosomal regions--5p13, 6q12, 16p13, and 17p11--are likely to harbor susceptibility genes for ADHD. The refinement of linkage within each of these regions lays the foundation for subsequent investigations using association methods to detect risk genes of moderate effect size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/424387

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Molecular genetic association studies, linkage studies, meta-analyses, and reviews have identified a number of genes that might contribute to the onset of childhood ADHD, including dopamine receptor genes, dopamine-beta-hydroxylase, dopamine transporter gene, norepinephrine transporter gene, noradrenergic receptor genes, MAO-A, COMT, serotonin receptor and transporter genes, and GABRB3.

    “have identified a number of genes that might contribute to the onset of childhood ADHD (cADHD), including, but not limited to, dopamine receptor genes such as DRD4, DRD5, DRD2, DRD3, dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH), dopamine transporter gene (DAT, SLC6A3)”

    From A Review of Heterogeneity in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (2019) · cites this paper as Ogdie et al., 2004

    The etiology section (page unavailable) reports replicated, though inconsistent and small, associations for DAT1, DRD4, and DRD5; the References also identify ADHD studies of DBH and serotonin-related genes. Our copy does not substantiate the full attributed list, including DRD2, DRD3, MAO-A, COMT, and GABRB3. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogdie, M. N., Fisher, S. E., Yang, M., Ishii, J., Francks, C., Loo, S. K., Cantor, R. M., McCracken, J. T., McGough, J. J., Smalley, S. L., & Nelson, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Stanley F.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
661-668
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130684484
Cited by
133
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 58277, R01MH058277, MH 01805, MH01969, K24MH001805)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007104, GM 07104)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, genetic linkage, fine mapping, affected sibling pairs, susceptibility genes
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6, Genetic Markers, Humans, Lod Score, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review