Cited by 253Child Welfare and AdoptionYouth Education and Societal DynamicsHomelessness and Social Issues

Approaching the transition to adulthood: Distinctive profiles of adolescents aging out of the child welfare system

Open access
Keller, Thomas E., Cusick, Gretchen Ruth, Courtney, Mark E.·2007·Social Service Review

Abstract

The transition to adulthood is marked by new roles and responsibilities in such interrelated domains as education, employment, and family formation. This study investigates the capacity of adolescents on the verge of emancipation from the child welfare system to navigate this transition. To explore heterogeneity in adolescents' preparation for independent living, person-oriented methods are applied to a large, representative sample of youth about to exit foster care. The analysis suggests four subpopulations defined by distinctive profiles on indicators reflecting multiple domains of life experience. Identifying the particular needs and challenges of subpopulations has implications for efforts to match adolescents aging out of the child welfare system with appropriate services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/519536

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated socio-ecological disruption due to placement instability, non-relative or group placement, and residential treatment can result in sparse support networks, service disengagement, problem behaviors, and social adjustment challenges.

    “Repeated socio-ecological disruption due to placement instability, non-relative or group placement, and residential treatment (Courtney et al., 2001; McCoy at al., 2008; Keller et al. 2007; Wulczyn et al., 2003) can also result in sparse support networks, service disengagement, problem behaviors, and social adjustment challenges.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keller, T. E., Cusick, G. R., & Courtney, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Portland State University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Social Service Review
Published
2007-09
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
453-484
ISSN
  • 0037-7961 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5404
OpenAlex
W2027529837
Cited by
253
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Service Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH070525)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
coming of age, aging out of foster care, child welfare system, foster youth, independent living, emancipation, youth profile, service matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review