Cited by 41Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

GLOBAL STRUCTURE OF ISOTHERMAL DIFFUSE X-RAY EMISSION ALONG THE FERMI BUBBLES

Open access
Kataoka, J., Tahara, M., Totani, T., Sofue, Y., Inoue, Y., Nakashima, S., Cheung, C. C.·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

In our previous works, we found absorbed thermal X-ray plasma with kT 0.3 keV observed ubiquitously near the edges of the Fermi bubbles and interpreted this emission as weakly shock-heated Galactic halo gas. Here we present a systematic and uniform analysis of archival Suzaku (29 pointings; 6 newly presented) and Swift (68 pointings; 49 newly presented) data within Galactic longitudes < 20° and latitude 5°≲ < 60°, covering the whole extent of the Fermi bubbles. We show that the plasma temperature is constant at kT 0.30 ± 0.07 keV, while the emission measure (EM) varies by an order of magnitude, increasing toward the Galactic center (i.e., low ) with enhancements at the North Polar Spur (NPS), SE-claw, and NW-clump features. Moreover, the EM distribution of kT 0.30 keV plasma is highly asymmetric in the northern and southern bubbles. Although the association of the X-ray emission with the bubbles is not conclusive, we compare the observed EM properties with simple models assuming (i) a filled halo without bubbles, whose gas density follows a hydrostatic isothermal model (King profile), and (ii) a bubble-in-halo in which two identical bubbles expand into the halo, forming thick shells of swept halo gas. We argue that the EM profile in the north ( b > 0°) favors (ii), whereas that of the south ( b < 0°) is rather close to (i), but a weak excess signature is clearly detected also in the south like NPS (South Polar Spur). Such an asymmetry, if due to the bubbles, cannot be fully understood only by the inclination of bubbles' axis against the Galactic disk normal, thus suggesting asymmetric outflow due to different environmental/initial conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/77

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The total energy in the eROSITA bubbles is Eth ≃10^56 erg.

    “Therefore, the energy density and the total energy in the eROSITA bubbles are, ϵ = nskBTs / ( γ -1) ≃ 2 × 10 -12 erg cm -3 and E th ≃ 10 56 erg, respectively (Kataoka et al. 2013, 2015; Predehl et al. 2020).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Kataoka et al. 2015

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses an energy release of 10^55–10^56 erg associated with the creation of the Fermi bubbles. It does not identify that figure as the total thermal energy of the eROSITA bubbles; the paper’s bubble model instead concerns X-ray emission along the Fermi bubbles. Thus the order of magnitude is present, but the attributed quantity and structure are not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The energy density in the eROSITA bubbles is ε ≃2×10^-12 erg cm^-3.

    “Therefore, the energy density and the total energy in the eROSITA bubbles are, ϵ = nskBTs / ( γ -1) ≃ 2 × 10 -12 erg cm -3 and E th ≃ 10 56 erg, respectively (Kataoka et al. 2013, 2015; Predehl et al. 2020).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Kataoka et al. 2015

    Section 4.2 gives a modeled Fermi-bubble shell density of 3.4 × 10^-3 cm^-3 and uses kT = 0.30 keV; these yield an energy density of roughly 2 × 10^-12 erg cm^-3 under the citing sentence’s formula. The paper does not give that energy density explicitly or establish it for the eROSITA bubbles. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kataoka, J., Tahara, M., Totani, T., Sofue, Y., Inoue, Y., Nakashima, S., & Cheung, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (JP)
  • United States Naval Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kataoka, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-07-01
Volume
807
Issue
1
Pages
77
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2268553864
Cited by
41
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • JAXA Repository (JAXA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Fermi bubbles, North Polar Spur, King profile, galactic outflows, Suzaku, Swift X-ray observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review