Cited by 205Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

First accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2

Open access
Heavner, Thomas P, Donley, Elizabeth A, Levi, Filippo, Costanzo, Giovanni, Parker, Thomas E, Shirley, Jon H, Ashby, Neil, Barlow, Stephan +1 more·2014·Metrologia

Abstract

We report the first accuracy evaluation of NIST-F2, a second-generation laser-cooled caesium fountain primary standard developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) with a cryogenic (liquid nitrogen) microwave cavity and flight region. The 80 K atom interrogation environment reduces the uncertainty due to the blackbody radiation shift by more than a factor of 50. Also, the Ramsey microwave cavity exhibits a high quality factor (>50 000) at this low temperature, resulting in a reduced distributed cavity phase shift. NIST-F2 has undergone many tests and improvements since we first began operation in 2008. In the last few years NIST-F2 has been compared against a NIST maser time scale and NIST-F1 (the US primary frequency standard) as part of in-house accuracy evaluations. We report the results of nine in-house comparisons since 2010 with a focus on the most recent accuracy evaluation. This paper discusses the design of the physics package, the laser and optics systems and the accuracy evaluation methods. The type B fractional uncertainty of NIST-F2 is shown to be 0.11 × 10 −15 and is dominated by microwave amplitude dependent effects. The most recent evaluation (August 2013) had a statistical (type A) fractional uncertainty of 0.44 × 10 −15 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/174

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microwave clocks were improved by three orders of magnitude in the past decades, now approaching the level of 10−16.

    “Microwave clocks were improved by three orders of magnitude in the past decades, now approaching the level of 10−16 (Heavner et al. 2014), see also Fig. 4.”

    From Clock networks for height system unification: a simulation study (2019) · cites this paper as Heavner et al. 2014

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says caesium fountain clocks have improved steadily and that several groups report fractional uncertainties of 2–3 × 10⁻¹⁶. This supports the claimed present level, but the paper does not quantify an improvement of three orders of magnitude over past decades. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heavner, T. P., Donley, E. A., Levi, F., Costanzo, G., Parker, T. E., Shirley, J. H., Ashby, N., Barlow, S., & Jefferts, S. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT)
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Corresponding author
Heavner, Thomas P
Venue
Metrologia
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
174-182
ISSN
  • 0026-1394 (ISSN-L)
  • 1681-7575
OpenAlex
W2162126832
Cited by
205
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Metrologia (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (IRIS Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
laser cooling, blackbody radiation shift, type B uncertainty, type A uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review