The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of tumour dose enhancement due to gold nanoparticles during typical radiation treatments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study
Open accessAbstract
A recent mice study demonstrated that gold nanoparticles could be safely administered and used to enhance the tumour dose during radiation therapy. The use of gold nanoparticles seems more promising than earlier methods because of the high atomic number of gold and because nanoparticles can more easily penetrate the tumour vasculature. However, to date, possible dose enhancement due to the use of gold nanoparticles has not been well quantified, especially for common radiation treatment situations. Therefore, the current preliminary study estimated this dose enhancement by Monte Carlo calculations for several phantom test cases representing radiation treatments with the following modalities: 140 kVp x-rays, 4 and 6 MV photon beams, and 192Ir gamma rays. The current study considered three levels of gold concentration within the tumour, two of which are based on the aforementioned mice study, and assumed either no gold or a single gold concentration level outside the tumour. The dose enhancement over the tumour volume considered for the 140 kVp x-ray case can be at least a factor of 2 at an achievable gold concentration of 7 mg Au/g tumour assuming no gold outside the tumour. The tumour dose enhancement for the cases involving the 4 and 6 MV photon beams based on the same assumption ranged from about 1% to 7%, depending on the amount of gold within the tumour and photon beam qualities. For the 192Ir cases, the dose enhancement within the tumour region ranged from 5% to 31%, depending on radial distance and gold concentration level within the tumour. For the 7 mg Au/g tumour cases, the loading of gold into surrounding normal tissue at 2 mg Au/g resulted in an increase in the normal tissue dose, up to 30%, negligible, and about 2% for the 140 kVp x-rays, 6 MV photon beam, and 192Ir gamma rays, respectively, while the magnitude of dose enhancement within the tumour was essentially unchanged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis
Brigger, I., Dubernet, C., & Couvreur, P. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00044-3 · Cited by 3,039
The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice
Hainfeld, J. F., Slatkin, D. N., & Smilowitz, H. M. (2004) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/n03 · Cited by 1,638
BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units
Rogers, D. W. O., Faddegon, B. A., Ding, G. X., Ma, C. ‐., We, J., & Mackie, T. R. (1995) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.597552 · Cited by 1,431
Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement
Cloutier, R. J. (1989) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3577533 · Cited by 1,076
Dvorak, H. F., Nagy, J. A., Dvorák, J., & Dvořàk, A. M. (1988) · PubMed Central · Cited by 679
Gold microspheres: a selective technique for producing biologically effective dose enhancement
M. Herold, I. J. D. (2000) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/09553000050151637 · Cited by 306
Radiation dose enhancement in tumors with iodine
Mello, R. S., Callisen, H., Winter, J., Kagan, A. R., & Norman, A. (1983) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.595378 · Cited by 167
Unezaki, S., Maruyama, K., Hosoda, J.-I., Nagae, I., Koyanagi, Y., Nakata, M., Ishida, O., Iwatsuru, M., & Tsuchiya, S. (1996) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/s0378-5173(96)04674-1 · Cited by 158
Regulla, D. F., Hieber, L., & Seidenbusch, M. C. (1998) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3579649 · Cited by 135
Tumour dose enhancement using modified megavoltage photon beams and contrast media
Robar, J. L., Riccio, S. A., & Martin, M. A. (2002) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/47/14/305 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements
Her, S., Jaffray, D. A., & Allen, C. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.012 · Cited by 865
Radiotherapy enhancement with gold nanoparticles
Hainfeld, J. F., Dilmanian, F. A., Slatkin, D. N., & Smilowitz, H. M. (2008) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1211/jpp.60.8.0005 · Cited by 733
Physical basis and biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization
Butterworth, K. T., McMahon, S. J., Currell, F. J., & Prise, K. M. (2012) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr31227a · Cited by 478
Biological consequences of nanoscale energy deposition near irradiated heavy atom nanoparticles
McMahon, S. J., Hyland, W. B., Muir, M. F., Coulter, J. A., Jain, S., Butterworth, K. T., Schettino, G., Dickson, G. R., Hounsell, A. R., O'Sullivan, J. M., et al. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00018 · Cited by 429
Nanoscale Radiotherapy with Hafnium Oxide Nanoparticles
Maggiorella, L., Barouch, G., Devaux, C., Pottier, A., Deutsch, E., Bourhis, J., Borghi, E., & Levy, L. (2012) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon.12.96 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, S. H.
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-07-13
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- N163-N173
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W2020170703
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of tumour dose enhancement due to gold nanoparticles during typical radiation treatments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0031-9155/50/15/n01
- The paper
- Cho, S. H. (2005). Estimation of tumour dose enhancement due to gold nanoparticles during typical radiation treatments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. Physics in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/15/n01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.