Cited by 315Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 207 of the 207 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 135 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Can one trust quantum simulators?

Open access

Abstract

Various fundamental phenomena of strongly correlated quantum systems such as high-T(c) superconductivity, the fractional quantum-Hall effect and quark confinement are still awaiting a universally accepted explanation. The main obstacle is the computational complexity of solving even the most simplified theoretical models which are designed to capture the relevant quantum correlations of the many-body system of interest. In his seminal 1982 paper (Feynman 1982 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467), Richard Feynman suggested that such models might be solved by 'simulation' with a new type of computer whose constituent parts are effectively governed by a desired quantum many-body dynamics. Measurements on this engineered machine, now known as a 'quantum simulator,' would reveal some unknown or difficult to compute properties of a model of interest. We argue that a useful quantum simulator must satisfy four conditions: relevance, controllability, reliability and efficiency. We review the current state of the art of digital and analog quantum simulators. Whereas so far the majority of the focus, both theoretically and experimentally, has been on controllability of relevant models, we emphasize here the need for a careful analysis of reliability and efficiency in the presence of imperfections. We discuss how disorder and noise can impact these conditions, and illustrate our concerns with novel numerical simulations of a paradigmatic example: a disordered quantum spin chain governed by the Ising model in a transverse magnetic field. We find that disorder can decrease the reliability of an analog quantum simulator of this model, although large errors in local observables are introduced only for strong levels of disorder. We conclude that the answer to the question 'Can we trust quantum simulators?' is … to some extent.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper argues that a useful quantum simulator must satisfy relevance, controllability, reliability, and efficiency, and reviews digital and analog implementations against these criteria. Using exact numerical simulations of a disordered transverse Ising chain, it finds that analog quantum simulators can be trusted “to some extent”: local observables are fairly robust to weak disorder, but global state fidelities, critical-point location, critical exponents, and central charge can be significantly corrupted.

Key findings

  • The authors propose four requirements for a quantum simulator: relevance, controllability, reliability, and efficiency; they emphasize that reliability and efficiency have received much less attention than controllability.
  • For a disordered transverse Ising chain with disorder strength \(r=0.1\) and \(L=400\) sites, the global simulator fidelity near the quantum phase transition drops as low as 55%, while local fidelities remain high: two-site fidelity \(f_2 \approx 0.998\) and single-site fidelity \(f_1 > 0.999\).
  • Disorder shifts the extracted critical point to larger \(\lambda\), increases the apparent correlation-length exponent \(\nu\) above its ideal value 1, and decreases the effective central charge \(c\), so ignoring disorder can assign the transition to the wrong universality class.
  • In dynamics, a local quench preserves high fidelity, but a global quench produces fidelities as low as 0.8 even for 50 spins; high-temperature initial states are more robust, with asymptotic infidelity scaling as \(1/T^2\), while low-temperature states are less reliable.

Methods

  • The paper combines a conceptual review and classification of digital and analog quantum simulators with original numerical simulations of the one-dimensional transverse Ising model with quenched Gaussian disorder in both couplings \(J_{ij}=J(1+r\delta_{ij})\) and fields \(h_i=h(1+r\eta_i)\).
  • The model is solved exactly via the Jordan-Wigner transformation to non-interacting fermions; the authors compute ground-state and time-dependent fidelities, reduced fidelities, correlations, energy gaps, critical exponents, and central charge.
  • Static fidelities \(F\), \(f_1\), and \(f_2\) were averaged over 5000 disorder realizations at chain length \(L=400\); finite-size scaling used chain lengths up to \(L=400\) with varying numbers of disorder realizations.

Limitations

  • The paper states that there exists no perfect and rigorous way to assess the reliability of analog quantum simulators, and that successful validation in a classically accessible regime does not guarantee robustness in classically inaccessible regimes.
  • The study assumes quenched disorder as the only imperfection and explicitly leaves dynamical noise, decoherence, and environment coupling for future work; it also considers only small disorder strengths, allowing the Griffiths phase to be ignored.
  • The transverse Ising model is exactly solvable and classically simulatable, so the authors describe the results as an initial attempt in a trivial model; evident limitations include the one-dimensional setting, finite-size pseudo-criticality, and the lack of direct demonstration for computationally hard models.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/082401

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

67 Not checked yet · 41 Own interpretation · 38 No basis given · 32 Own result · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 127 references — free account

Show all 85 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 63
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 52
95 of 95
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Various fundamental phenomena of strongly correlated quantum systems, such as high-Tc superconductivity, the fractional quantum-Hall effect, and quark confinement, are still awaiting a universally accepted explanation.

    “Various fundamental phenomena of strongly-correlated quantum systems such as highT c superconductivity, the fractional quantum-Hall effect, and quark confinement are still awaiting a universally accepted explanation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Quenched disorder is the only possible imperfection considered in the study.

    “We study how imperfections affect the results of a AQS simulating that model, where, for simplicity, we assume quenched disorder as the only possible imperfection.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Considering small disorder strengths allows the Griffiths phase to be ignored, especially in finite-size systems.

    “In this study, we consider small disorder strengths, which allows us to ignore the Griffiths phase, especially in finite-size systems.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In the absence of disorder, a quantum simulation of dynamics can much more easily outperform classical computers.

    “Therefore, one can assume that in the absence of disorder, a quantum simulation of dynamics can much more easily outperform classical computers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no known way to fault-tolerantly error-correct analog quantum simulators.

    “Since to date there exists no known way to fault-tolerantly error-correct AQSs, there is a natural tendency to explore the advantages of DQSs, where error correction is possible.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Real materials, such as high-Tc cuprates, have imperfections.

    “For any real material, like a highT c cuprate, has imperfections.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The dynamical critical exponent ζ does not change much for small disorder.

    “Assuming that it does not change much for small disorder, we identify as an approximation the critical point with the mean of the crossing points curves 1 / ( L ∆( L )) for L = 100 , 150 , 200 , 300 , 350 , 400 with 10000 realizations of disorder each.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 205 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lee P A, 2008, Rep. Prog. Phys., 71
  2. Alba V, 2011, J. Stat. Mech.
  3. Aharonov D Ta-Shma A, 2003, Proc. 35th STOC, 20
  4. Calabrese P, 2004, J. Stat. Mech., 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 309

Metadata

Authors
Hauke, P., Cucchietti, F. M., Tagliacozzo, L., Deutsch, I., & Lewenstein, M.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Photonic Sciences (ES)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Hauke, Philipp
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Published
2012-07-24
Volume
75
Issue
8
Pages
082401
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
OpenAlex
W2093995600
Cited by
315
References
205
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
quantum simulators, transverse-field Ising model, analog quantum simulation, digital quantum simulation, controllability, strongly correlated systems, high-temperature superconductivity, fractional quantum Hall effect, quark confinement
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Models, Chemical, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Quantum Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review