Cited by 50Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsVacuum and Plasma ArcsMagnetic confinement fusion research

The effects of secondary electron emission on plasma sheath characteristics and electron transport in an E × B discharge via kinetic simulations

Open access
Tavant, Antoine, Croes, Vivien, Lucken, Romain, Lafleur, Trevor, Bourdon, Anne, Chabert, Pascal·2018·Plasma Sources Science and Technology

Abstract

Hall-effect thrusters, which are electrostatic devices based on an E × B plasma discharge, have successfully been used as satellite propulsion systems for the last few decades. However, the presence of anomalous electron cross-field transport is still poorly understood, and involves complex and strongly coupled mechanisms such as azimuthal electron drift instabilities and intense secondary electron emission (SEE) from the thruster walls. The present work focuses on the relative importance of these two phenomena. We use a 2D particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision model configured to simulate the radial-azimuthal directions near the thruster exit plane. A constant radial magnetic field and axial electric field are imposed, and electron drift instabilities are observed in the azimuthal ( E × B ) direction. A simplified SEE model is implemented and an extensive parametric study is performed to directly determine the effect on electron transport. It is found that, for the operating conditions used in our simulations, SEE enhances the near-wall electron mobility by a factor 2, while reducing the bulk plasma mobility by about 20% (due to electron cooling). However, the dominant contribution to anomalous electron transport is still observed to be caused by electron drift instabilities driven by the E × B discharge configuration. SEE modifies the electron mobility profile, but the spatially-averaged value remains relatively constant. Three different operating regimes are identified depending on the SEE rate value: two that are stable, and a third which shows an oscillatory behaviour. In addition to electron transport, the kinetic simulations give new insight into the plasma sheath formation at the radial walls, and comparison with typical analytical sheath models demonstrate important differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6595/aaeccd

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therefore, such discharges are often modeled by two-fluid or hybrid descriptions.

    “Therefore, such discharges are often modeled either by the two-fluid 109-112 or by hybrid 21,27 (fluid for electrons and particle for ions, see Sec. IV A) descriptions.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [112]

    The citation is attached to the hybrid-description examples, but Section 2.1 identifies this paper’s model as a 2D-3V particle-in-cell/Monte-Carlo simulation, not a hybrid model with fluid electrons and particle ions. The Introduction mentions other fluid simulations; it does not describe this study as hybrid. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Mazouffre S 2016 Electric propulsion for satellites and spacecrafts: established technologies and novel approaches Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25 3 · DOI
  2. Goebel D M and Katz I 2008 Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters (New York: Wiley)
  3. Morozov A I and Savelyev V V 2000 Reviews of Plasma Physics ed B B Kadomtsev and V D Shafranov (New York: Springer Science)
  4. Adam J C, Héron A and Laval G 2004 Study of stationary plasma thrusters using two-dimensional fully kinetic simulations Phys. Plasmas 11 295 · DOI
  5. Boeuf J P 2017 Tutorial: physics and modeling of Hall thrusters J. Appl. Phys. 121 1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Meezan N B, Hargus W A Jr. and Cappelli M A 2001 Anomalous electron mobility in a coaxial Hall discharge plasma Phys. Rev. E 63 026410 · DOI
  7. Garrigues L, Pérez-Luna J, Lo J, Hagelaar G J M, Boeuf J P and Mazouffre S 2009 Empirical electron cross- field mobility in a Hall effect thruster Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 141501 · DOI
  8. Adam J C et al 2008 simulation, and diagnostics of Hall effect thrusters Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 24 124041 · DOI
  9. Yoshikawa S and Rose D J 1962 Anomalous diffusion of a plasma across a magnetic field Phys. Fluids 5 334 · DOI
  10. Janes G S and Lowder R S 1966 Anomalous electron diffusion and ion acceleration in a low density plasma Phys. Fluids 9 115 · DOI
  11. Choueiri E Y 2001 Fundamental difference between the two Hall thruster variants Phys. Plasmas 8 1411 · DOI
  12. Smith A W and Cappelli M A 2009 Time and space-correlated plasma potential measurements in the near field of a coaxial Hall plasma discharge Phys. Plasmas 16 073504 · DOI
  13. Scharfe M K, Gascon N, Cappelli M A and Fernandez E 2006 Comparison of hybrid Hall thruster model to experimental measurements Phys. Plasmas 13 083505 · DOI
  14. Croes V, Lafleur T, Bonaventura Z, Bourdon A and Chabert P 2017 2D particle-in-cell simulations of the electron drift instability and associated anomalous electron transport in hall-effect thrusters Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26 3 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lafleur T, Baalrud S D and Chabert P 2016 Theory for the anomalous electron transport in Hall effect thrusters: II. Kinetic model Phys. Plasmas 23 053503 · DOI
  16. Lafleur T and Chabert P 2017 The role of instability-enhanced friction on 'anomalous' electron and ion transport in Hall- effect thrusters Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 1 · DOI
  17. Gascon N, Dudeck M and Barral S 2003 Wall material effects in stationary plasma thrusters: I. Parametric studies of an SPT-100 Phys. Plasmas 10 4123 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Zhurin V V, Kaufman H R and Robinson R S 1999 Physics of closed drift thrusters Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 8 1 · DOI
  19. Sydorenko D, Smolyakov A I, Kaganovich I D and Raitses Y 2008 Electron kinetic effects and beam related instabilities in Hall thrusters Phys. Plasmas 15 053506 · DOI
  20. Boniface C, Garrigues L, Hagelaar G J M, Boeuf J P, Gawron D and Mazouffre S 2006 Anomalous cross-field electron transport in a Hall thruster Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 161503 · DOI
  21. Hagelaar G J M, Bareilles J, Garrigues L and Boeuf J P 2003 Role of anomalous electron transport in a stationary plasma thruster simulation J. Appl. Phys. 93 67 · DOI
  22. Meezan N B and Capelli M A 2002 Kinetic study of wall collisions in a Coaxial Hall discharge Phys. Rev. E 66 · DOI
  23. Parra F I, Ahedo E, Fife J M and Martinez-Sanchez M 2006 A two-dimensional hybrid model of the hall thruster discharge J. Appl. Phys. 100 023304 · DOI
  24. Smirnov A N, Raitses Y and Fisch N J 2006 Electron cross- field transport in a miniaturized cylindrical Hall thruster IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 34 132 · DOI
  25. Mazouffre S, Tsikata S and Vaudolon J 2014 Development and experimental characterization of a wall-less Hall thruster J. Appl. Phys. 116 24 · DOI
  26. Hobbs G D and Wesson J A 1967 Heat flow through a Langmuir sheath in the presence of electron emission Plasma Phys. 9 1 · DOI
  27. Héron A and Adam J C 2013 Anomalous conductivity in Hall thrusters: effects of the non-linear coupling of the electron- cyclotron drift instability with secondary electron emission of the walls Phys. Plasmas 20 082313 · DOI
  28. Taccogna F, Longo S, Capitelli M and Schneider R 2009 Anomalous transport induced by sheath instability in Hall effect thrusters Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 251502 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Garrigues L, Hagelaar G, Boeuf J P, Raitses Y, Smirnov A and Fisch N J 2008 Simulations of a miniaturized cylindrical hall thruster IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 36 5 · DOI
  30. Ahedo E 2002 Presheath/sheath model with secondary electron emission from two parallel walls Phys. Plasma 9 10 · DOI
  31. Ahedo E and Parra F I 2005 Partial trapping of secondary- electron emission in a Hall thruster plasma Phys. Plasma 12 7 · DOI
  32. Langendorf S and Walker M 2015 Effect of secondary electron emission on the plasma sheath Phys. Plasma 22 3 · DOI
  33. Domínguez-Vázquez A, Taccogna F and Ahedo E 2018 Particle modeling of radial electron dynamics in a controlled discharge of a Hall thruster Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 064006 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Croes V 2017 Modelisation bidimensionnelle de la decharge plasma dans un propulseur de Hall PhD Thesis Ecole Polytechnique
  35. Birdsall C K and Langdon A B 1985 Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation (New York: McGraw-Hill)
  36. Boeuf J P 2014 Rotating structures in low temperature magnetized plasmas-insight from particle simulations Front. Phys. 2 74 · DOI
  37. Smirnov A N, Raitses Y and Fisch N J 2004 Electron cross- field transport in a low power cylindrical Hall thruster Phys. Plasmas 11 4922 · DOI
  38. Sydorenko D, Kaganovich I D, Raitses Y and Smolyakov A I 2009 Breakdown of a space charge limited regime of a sheath in a weakly collisional plasma bounded by walls with secondary electron emission Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 145004 · DOI
  39. Sydorenko D, Smolyakov A, Kaganovich I and Raitses Y 2006 Kinetic simulation of secondary electron emission effects in Hall thrusters Phys. Plasma 13 014501 · DOI
  40. Janhunen S, Smolyakov A, Sydorenko D, Jimenez M, Kaganovich I and Raitses Y 2018 Evolution of the electron cyclotron drift instability in two-dimensions Phys. Plasma 25 082308 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tavant, A., Croes, V., Lucken, R., Lafleur, T., Bourdon, A., & Chabert, P.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Tavant, Antoine
Venue
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
124001
ISSN
  • 0963-0252 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6595
OpenAlex
W2898999439
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plasma Sources Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CHIN-003-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
secondary electron emission, Hall thruster, anomalous electron transport, plasma sheath, electron mobility, electron cooling, particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision simulation, satellite propulsion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review