Cited by 189Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Primordial statistical anisotropy generated at the end of inflation

Open access
Yokoyama, Shuichiro, Soda, Jiro·2008·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

We present a new mechanism for generating primordial statistical anisotropy of curvature perturbations. We introduce a vector field which has a non-minimal kinetic term and couples with a waterfall field in a hybrid inflation model. In such a system, the vector field gives fluctuations of the end of inflation and hence induces a subcomponent of curvature perturbations. Since the vector has a preferred direction, the statistical anisotropy could appear in the fluctuations. We present the explicit formula for the statistical anisotropy in the primordial power spectrum and the bispectrum of curvature perturbations. Interestingly, there is the possibility that the statistical anisotropy does not appear in the power spectrum but does appear in the bispectrum. We also find that the statistical anisotropy provides the shape dependence to the bispectrum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anisotropic spatial curvature induces anisotropic expansion, which affects the free streaming of photons and deforms the surface of last scattering, along with perception of angular scales on it.

    “Indeed, anisotropic spatial curvature induces anisotropic expansion, which affects the free streaming of photons and thus deforms the surface of last scattering, along with our perception of angular scales on it [37].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction and Summary discuss statistical anisotropy in primordial curvature perturbations, not anisotropic spatial curvature causing anisotropic expansion. Searches for photon free streaming, the surface of last scattering, and perceived angular scales found no passage addressing the claimed causal chain; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Late-time anisotropic expansion induces a quadrupole in the CMB at order Ω0curv, which absent cancellations provides a stronger constraint on Ω0curv.

    “however it should be emphasized that late-time anisotropic expansion induces a quadrupole in the CMB, itself appearing at order Ω 0 curv , which absent cancellations provides a stronger constraint on Ω 0 curv [37].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction and Summary discuss primordial statistical anisotropy generated at the end of inflation, not late-time anisotropic expansion. Searches for a CMB quadrupole, Ωcurv, and a resulting constraint found no passage addressing the attributed claim. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Eriksen H K, 2004, Astrophys. J., 605, 14, 10.1086/382267 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Eriksen H K, 2004, Astrophys. J., 609, 1198, 10.1086/421972 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08229.x · DOI
  4. Jaffe T R, 2005, Astrophys. J., 629, L1, 10.1086/444454 · DOI
  5. Eriksen H K, 2007, Astrophys. J., 660, L81, 10.1086/518091 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.071301 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11749.x · DOI
  9. Hajian A, 2003, Astrophys. J., 597, L5, 10.1086/379757 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123521 · DOI
  11. Armendariz-Picon C, 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2006, 002, 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/002 · DOI
  12. Armendariz-Picon C, 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2007, 014, 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/09/014 · DOI
  13. Gumrukcuoglu A E, 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2007, 005, 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/11/005 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09980.x · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023507 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.103002 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.023534 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083502 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Pereira T S, 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2007, 006, 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/09/006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pitrou C, 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2008, 004, 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/004 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.103529 · DOI
  22. Lyth D H, 2005, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2005, 006, 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/11/006 · DOI
  23. Alabidi L, 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2006, 006, 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/08/006 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.123516 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.121301 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.121301 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083004 · DOI
  28. 10.1143/PTP.95.71 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1143/PTP.99.763 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lyth D H, 2005, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2005, 004, 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/05/004 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121302 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043527 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Martin J, 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2008, 025, 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/01/025 · DOI
  34. Maldacena J M, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 2003, 013, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.063002 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083502 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.063506 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yokoyama, S., & Soda, J.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2008-08-06
Volume
2008
Issue
08
Pages
005
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2073441565
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18654047, 17340075, 18740132, 18540277, 18540262)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
curvature perturbations, hybrid inflation, waterfall field, vector fields, end of inflation, primordial bispectrum, primordial power spectrum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review