CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Constraints on non-minimal coupling from quantum cosmology

Wang, Shao-Jiang, Yamada, Masaki, Vilenkin, Alexander·2019·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
DOI 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Hartle-Hawking wave function might evolve into eternal inflation, which is believed to generically lead to predictions that are independent of the initial state.

    “Alternatively, the Hartle-Hawking wave function might evolve into eternal inflation, which is believed to generically lead to predictions that are independent of the initial state[23,24].”

    From On Quantum Creation of a Toroidal Universe (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction identifies the Hartle–Hawking no-boundary proposal, and §3.5 analyzes its wave function. Neither passage says that it might evolve into eternal inflation or that eternal inflation yields predictions independent of the initial state. Searches for those claims in our copy found no passage addressing them. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3560 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.888 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/BF02790571 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90088-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevD.30.509 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ya. B. Zeldovich, 1984, Sov. Astron. Lett., 10, 135
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103508 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.171301 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.023509 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.3390/universe4100100 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1142/S0218271819300052 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043505 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.081302 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.066003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.066010 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.3012 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90448-5 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90587-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072 · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rsta.2017.0118 · DOI
  23. 10.3389/fspas.2018.00040 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.051301 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.043530 · DOI
  26. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3817-7 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1777 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90073-8 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.898 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023520 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084039 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023501 · DOI
  33. T. Chiba, 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2008, 021, 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/021 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/978-3-642-19760-4_23 · DOI
  35. K. Nozari, 2010, Phys. Scripta, 82, 015901, 10.1088/0031-8949/82/01/015901 · DOI
  36. J.-O. Gong, 2011, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2011, 023, 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/09/023 · DOI
  37. D.P. George, 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 024, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/024 · DOI
  38. T. Chiba, 2013, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2013, 040, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/040 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024041 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.008 · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084033 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.103516 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.123510 · DOI
  44. T. Prokopec, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 031, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/031 · DOI
  45. T. Prokopec, 2013, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2013, 027, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/027 · DOI
  46. G. Domènech, 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2015, 022, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S.-J., Yamada, M., & Vilenkin, A.
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2019-08-20
Volume
2019
Issue
08
Pages
025-025
ISSN
1475-7516
DOI
10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/025
Cited by
16
References
1
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review