The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Intra-retinal placement of stimulating electrodes can provide close and stable proximity to target neurons. We assessed improvement in stimulation thresholds and selectivity of the direct and network-mediated retinal stimulation with intraretinal electrodes, compared to epiretinal and subretinal placements. APPROACH: Stimulation thresholds of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in wild-type rat retina were measured using the patch-clamp technique. Direct and network-mediated responses were discriminated using various synaptic blockers. MAIN RESULTS: Three types of RGC responses were identified: short latency (SL, τ < 5 ms) originating in RGCs, medium latency (ML, 3 < τ < 70 ms) originating in the inner nuclear layer and long latency (LL, τ > 40 ms) originating in photoreceptors. Cathodic epiretinal stimulation exhibited the lowest threshold for direct RGC response and the highest direct selectivity (network/direct thresholds ratio), exceeding a factor of 3 with pulse durations below 0.5 ms. For network-mediated stimulation, the lowest threshold was obtained with anodic pulses in OPL position, and its network selectivity (direct/network thresholds ratio) increased with pulse duration, exceeding a factor of 4 at 10 ms. Latency of all three types of responses decreased with increasing strength of the stimulus. SIGNIFICANCE: These results define the optimal range of pulse durations, pulse polarities and electrode placement for the retinal prostheses aiming at direct or network-mediated stimulation of RGCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The device position (epiretinal, subretinal or suprachoroidal) and the characteristics of the electrical pulses (such as duration and waveform) determine which cell population is predominantly activated [28,29].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The metabotropic glutamate receptors: Structure and functions
Pin, J., & Duvoisin, R. M. (1995) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/0028-3908(94)00129-g · Cited by 2,273
The Major Cell Populations of the Mouse Retina
Jeon, C.-J., Strettoi, E., & Masland, R. H. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-21-08936.1998 · Cited by 1,429
Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Blindness due to Neovascular Maculopathy
Ferris, F. L., Fine, S., & Hyman, L. (1984) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1984.01040031330019 · Cited by 1,109
Patch Clamp Techniques for Studying Ionic Channels in Excitable Membranes
Sakmann, B. J., & Neher, E. (1984) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.46.030184.002323 · Cited by 799
Will Retinal Implants Restore Vision?
Zrenner, E. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067996 · Cited by 736
Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis
Humayun, M. S., Dorn, J. D., da Cruz, L., Dagnelie, G., Sahel, J.-A., Stanga, P. E., Cideciyan, A. V., Duncan, J. L., Eliott, D., Filley, E., et al. (2012) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.028 · Cited by 700
Genetic Reactivation of Cone Photoreceptors Restores Visual Responses in Retinitis Pigmentosa
Busskamp, V., Duebel, J., Bálya, D., Fradot, M., Viney, T. J., Siegert, S., Groner, A. C., Cabuy, E., Forster, V., Seeliger, M. W., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1190897 · Cited by 660
Stone, J. L. (1992) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1992.01080230134038 · Cited by 480
Perspective on Genes and Mutations Causing Retinitis Pigmentosa
Daiger, S. P. (2007) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.125.2.151 · Cited by 476
Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS
Stingl, K., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Besch, D., Braun, A., Bruckmann, A., Gekeler, F., Greppmaier, U., Hipp, S., Hörtdörfer, G., Kernstock, C., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0077 · Cited by 473
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bendali A, 2012, ARVO’12: Annu. Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, paper 5528/D1133
- Cho A, 2013, ARVO’13: Annu. Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, paper 1035/C0012
- Gefen R, 2012, 7th Biennial World Congress on Artificial Vision
- Phelan J K, 2000, Mol. Vis., 6, 116
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photovoltaic restoration of sight with high visual acuity
Lorach, H., Goetz, G., Smith, R., Lei, X., Mandel, Y., Kamins, T. I., Mathieson, K., Huie, P., Harris, J. S., Sher, A., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3851 · Cited by 341
Retinal stimulation strategies to restore vision: fundamentals and systems
Yue, L., Weiland, J. D., Roska, B., & Humayun, M. S. (2016) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.05.002 · Cited by 272
An update on retinal prostheses
Ayton, L. N., Barnes, N., Dagnelie, G., Fujikado, T., Goetz, G., Hornig, R., Jones, B. W., Muqit, M. M. K., Rathbun, D. L., Stingl, K., et al. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.029 · Cited by 223
Advances in retinal prosthesis systems
Bloch, E., Luo, Y., & da Cruz, L. (2019) · Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1177/2515841418817501 · Cited by 201
Design and validation of a foldable and photovoltaic wide-field epiretinal prosthesis
Ferlauto, L., Airaghi Leccardi, M. J. I., Chenais, N. A. L., Gilliéron, S. C. A., Vagni, P., Bevilacqua, M., Wolfensberger, T. J., Sivula, K., & Ghezzi, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03386-7 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Boinagrov, D., Pangratz-Fuehrer, S., Goetz, G., & Palanker, D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boinagrov, David
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-03-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 026008
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- PMC
- PMC4082997
- OpenAlex
- W2058723867
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Chongqing University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (R01EY018608)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- retinal ganglion cells, retinal prosthesis, epiretinal stimulation, subretinal stimulation, stimulation selectivity, stimulation threshold, pulse duration, pulse polarity, inner plexiform layer, photoreceptors, rat retina
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Male, Microelectrodes, Nerve Net, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review