Cited by 473Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersTactile and Sensory Interactions

Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS

Open access
Stingl, Katarina, Bartz-Schmidt, Karl Ulrich, Besch, Dorothea, Braun, Angelika, Bruckmann, Anna, Gekeler, Florian, Greppmaier, Udo, Hipp, Stephanie +10 more·2013·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

This study aims at substituting the essential functions of photoreceptors in patients who are blind owing to untreatable forms of hereditary retinal degenerations. A microelectronic neuroprosthetic device, powered via transdermal inductive transmission, carrying 1500 independent microphotodiode-amplifier-electrode elements on a 9 mm 2 chip, was subretinally implanted in nine blind patients. Light perception (8/9), light localization (7/9), motion detection (5/9, angular speed up to 35 deg s −1 ), grating acuity measurement (6/9, up to 3.3 cycles per degree) and visual acuity measurement with Landolt C-rings (2/9) up to Snellen visual acuity of 20/546 (corresponding to decimal 0.037 or corresponding to 1.43 logMAR (minimum angle of resolution)) were restored via the subretinal implant. Additionally, the identification, localization and discrimination of objects improved significantly ( n = 8; p < 0.05 for each subtest) in repeated tests over a nine-month period. Three subjects were able to read letters spontaneously and one subject was able to read letters after training in an alternative-force choice test. Five subjects reported implant-mediated visual perceptions in daily life within a field of 15° of visual angle. Control tests were performed each time with the implant's power source switched off. These data show that subretinal implants can restore visual functions that are useful for daily life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2013.0077

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phosphene fading is a significant limitation in artificial vision.

    “A significant limitation in artificial vision is phosphene fading [148][149][150]”
  • Phosphene fading affects retinal prostheses and makes continuous perception above flicker fusion nearly impossible.

    “which affects retinal prostheses and makes continuous perception above flicker fusion nearly impossible.”
  • The subretinal visual implant Alpha IMS was one of the first CE-approved implantable medical devices with a high-channel-count (1500 pixels) and implantable electronics in contact with the central nervous system.

    “The subretinal visual implant Alpha IMS [150] was one of the first CE-approved implantable medical devices with a high-channel-count (1500 pixels) and implantable electronics in contact with the central nervous system.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Stingl K 2010 Subretinal electronic chips can restore useful visual functions in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.) 55, (Suppl. 1) 10.1515/BMT.2010.435 (doi:10.1515/BMT.2010.435) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stingl, K., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Besch, D., Braun, A., Bruckmann, A., Gekeler, F., Greppmaier, U., Hipp, S., Hörtdörfer, G., Kernstock, C., Koitschev, A., Kusnyerik, A., Sachs, H., Schatz, A., Stingl, K. T., Peters, T., Wilhelm, B., & Zrenner, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 12–16, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Retina Implant AG, Gerhard-Kindler-Straße 8, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany
  • Mobility Trainer, Mozartweg 11, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Klinikum Stuttgart (DE)
  • Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt (DE)
  • STZ eyetrial (DE)
Corresponding author
Zrenner, Eberhart
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2013-04-22
Volume
280
Issue
1757
Pages
20130077
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2155668458
Cited by
473
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 15
FWCI
27.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
subretinal implant, retinal prosthesis, artificial vision, wireless power transfer, inductive power transfer, inherited retinal degeneration, blindness, photoreceptor replacement, visual acuity, light perception, object recognition, letter reading, motion detection
MeSH terms
Adult, Blindness, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Prosthesis Design, Visual Acuity, Visual Perception, Implants, Experimental, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Visual Prosthesis, Neural Prostheses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review