Cited by 202EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain–computer interface

Open access
McFarland, Dennis J, Krusienski, Dean J, Sarnacki, William A, Wolpaw, Jonathan R·2008·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can provide nonmuscular communication and control to people who are severely paralyzed. BCIs can use noninvasive or invasive techniques for recording the brain signals that convey the user's commands. Although noninvasive BCIs are used for simple applications, it has frequently been assumed that only invasive BCIs, which use electrodes implanted in the brain, will be able to provide multidimensional sequential control of a robotic arm or a neuroprosthesis. The present study shows that a noninvasive BCI using scalp-recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and an adaptive algorithm can provide people, including people with spinal cord injuries, with two-dimensional cursor movement and target selection. Multiple targets were presented around the periphery of a computer screen, with one designated as the correct target. The user's task was to use EEG to move a cursor from the center of the screen to the correct target and then to use an additional EEG feature to select the target. If the cursor reached an incorrect target, the user was instructed not to select it. Thus, this task emulated the key features of mouse operation. The results indicate that people with severe motor disabilities could use brain signals for sequential multidimensional movement and selection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct evidence of learned SMR modulation at the BCI feature level is rare or incomplete, derived in able-bodied populations and not longitudinal.

    “Direct evidence of learned SMR modulation at the BCI feature level is, in fact, rare or incomplete, derived in able-bodied populations and not longitudinal [10,23,26,28,38–41].”
  • Users have reported reaching a state of proficiency through learning where BCI control becomes "automatic," as they no longer need to engage explicitly in MI.

    “Interestingly, users have reported reaching a state of proficiency through learning where BCI control becomes “automatic,” as they no longer need to engage explicitly in MI [23,40–42,50,60,61].”
  • Works where users acquired BCI control, in able-bodied and end-user populations, do not report any learning metric over time.

    “Firstly, works where users acquired BCI control (able-bodied [3,25] and end-users [40,41,51,62,63]) do not report any learning metric over time.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McFarland, D. J., Krusienski, D. J., Sarnacki, W. A., & Wolpaw, J. R.
Affiliations
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • University of North Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2008-03-05
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
101-110
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2157424831
Cited by
202
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (EB00856, HD30146)
  • National Institutes of Health (HD30146)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (HD30146, EB00856)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 00856, HD30146, R01EB000856)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD030146, HD30146)
  • National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
non-invasive brain-computer interface, EEG, cursor movement, target selection, adaptive algorithms, spinal cord injury, motor impairment, neural prostheses, multidimensional control, assistive technology
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Communication Aids for Disabled, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Spinal Cord Injuries, User-Computer Interface, Computer Peripherals, Evoked Potentials, Motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review