Cited by 454EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement

Open access
McFarland, Dennis J, Sarnacki, William A, Wolpaw, Jonathan R·2010·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can use brain signals from the scalp (EEG), the cortical surface (ECoG), or within the cortex to restore movement control to people who are paralyzed. Like muscle-based skills, BCIs' use requires activity-dependent adaptations in the brain that maintain stable relationships between the person's intent and the signals that convey it. This study shows that humans can learn over a series of training sessions to use EEG for three-dimensional control. The responsible EEG features are focused topographically on the scalp and spectrally in specific frequency bands. People acquire simultaneous control of three independent signals (one for each dimension) and reach targets in a virtual three-dimensional space. Such BCI control in humans has not been reported previously. The results suggest that with further development noninvasive EEG-based BCIs might control the complex movements of robotic arms or neuroprostheses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brown L The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary 1993 2 Oxford Clarenden Press 2882
  2. Wolpaw JR McFarland DJ Neat GW Forneris CA An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol 1991 78 252 259 1707798

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McFarland, D. J., Sarnacki, W. A., & Wolpaw, J. R.
Affiliations
New York State Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Sarnacki, William A
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2010-05-11
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
036007
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W1989927577
Cited by
454
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 40
FWCI
22.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB 00856, R01EB000856)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD030146, HD30146)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
brain-computer interface, EEG, motor learning, neural prostheses, robotic arm control, frequency bands
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Imagination, Male, Motion, Spinal Cord Injuries, User-Computer Interface, Computer Peripherals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review