Cited by 496Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMotor Control and Adaptation

Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array

Open access
Simeral, J D, Kim, S-P, Black, M J, Donoghue, J P, Hochberg, L R·2011·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

The ongoing pilot clinical trial of the BrainGate neural interface system aims in part to assess the feasibility of using neural activity obtained from a small-scale, chronically implanted, intracortical microelectrode array to provide control signals for a neural prosthesis system. Critical questions include how long implanted microelectrodes will record useful neural signals, how reliably those signals can be acquired and decoded, and how effectively they can be used to control various assistive technologies such as computers and robotic assistive devices, or to enable functional electrical stimulation of paralyzed muscles. Here we examined these questions by assessing neural cursor control and BrainGate system characteristics on five consecutive days 1000 days after implant of a 4 × 4 mm array of 100 microelectrodes in the motor cortex of a human with longstanding tetraplegia subsequent to a brainstem stroke. On each of five prospectively-selected days we performed time-amplitude sorting of neuronal spiking activity, trained a population-based Kalman velocity decoding filter combined with a linear discriminant click state classifier, and then assessed closed-loop point-and-click cursor control. The participant performed both an eight-target center-out task and a random target Fitts metric task which was adapted from a human-computer interaction ISO standard used to quantify performance of computer input devices. The neural interface system was further characterized by daily measurement of electrode impedances, unit waveforms and local field potentials. Across the five days, spiking signals were obtained from 41 of 96 electrodes and were successfully decoded to provide neural cursor point-and-click control with a mean task performance of 91.3% ± 0.1% (mean ± s.d.) correct target acquisition. Results across five consecutive days demonstrate that a neural interface system based on an intracortical microelectrode array can provide repeatable, accurate point-and-click control of a computer interface to an individual with tetraplegia 1000 days after implantation of this sensor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025027

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Morrell M Neural Interfaces Conf. (Long Beach CA, 2010) 2010 personal communication
  2. Pino A Kalogeros E Salemis E Kouroupetroglou G Brain computer interface cursor measures for motion-impaired and able-bodied users Proc. Int’l Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction—HCI Int’l 2003 (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Assoc., Inc) 2003 1462 1466

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simeral, J. D., Kim, S.-P., Black, M. J., Donoghue, J. P., & Hochberg, L. R.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Simeral, J D
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2011-03-24
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
025027
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2149331527
Cited by
496
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
FWCI
20.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hd53403-6-0-1)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (C06 16549-01A1)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC009899)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-25074, R37NS025074, R01NS025074)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB007401)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (RC1HD063931, N01 HD053403)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
intracortical microelectrode arrays, neural interfaces, tetraplegia, chronic implantation, motor cortex, electrode impedance, local field potentials, neural prosthesis, brainstem infarction
MeSH terms
Brain, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Imagination, Microelectrodes, Middle Aged, Quadriplegia, User-Computer Interface, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review