CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A review of devices and methods for measuring thermal emissivity at cryogenic temperatures

Zhang, S Y, Li, Y, Li, L F·2022·IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
DOI 10.1088/1757-899x/1241/1/012050
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Thermal emissivity is an important parameter in characterizing the thermal radiative properties of materials and a critical factor in radiative heat transfer. The radiation of an actual object is different from that of the blackbody: its radiation energy varies irregularly with wavelength and temperature. To investigate the thermal radiative properties, thermal emissivity could be measured at cryogenic temperatures. In this paper, measuring methods and factors affecting the thermal emissivity of metals and infrared coatings at low temperatures were comprehensively reviewed. Two existing methods for measuring thermal emissivity at low temperatures, the calorimetry and radiometry methods, were described. Moreover, this work also discussed several factors such as material properties, surface temperature, and surface conditions. Testing devices for measurement of emissivity at low temperatures based on calorimetry and radiometry were reviewed and analyzed emphatically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1757-899x/1241/1/012050

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhang et al. review mainly provided a general overview of existing methods and instruments, briefly introducing the two main testing techniques along with sample data and instrument parameters, but it did not include in-depth discussion.

    “For example, A review by Zhang et al. [60] mainly provided a general overview of existing methods and instruments, briefly introducing the two main testing techniques along with sample data and instrument parameters, but it did not include in depth discussion.”

    From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [60]

  • Review articles on thermal radiation testing methods have previously been published.

    “Review articles [60,61] on thermal radiation testing methods have previously been published.”

    From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Arenberg, 2014, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, 9143
  2. DiPirro, 2014, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 1573, 110
  3. Franck, 2014, Cryogenics, 64, 235, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.06.011 · DOI
  4. Lightsey, 2014, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, 9143
  5. Shinozaki, 2019, IOP Conference Series: Mat. Sci. Eng., 502
  6. Fu, 2012, Meas. Sci. Technol., 23, 10.1088/0957-0233/23/2/025006 · DOI
  7. Králík, 2016, Metrologia, 53, 743, 10.1088/0026-1394/53/2/743 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Rui, 2020, Shandong Ceramics, 43, 8
  9. Cárdenas-García, 2014, Int. J. Thermophys, 35, 1299, 10.1007/s10765-014-1686-1 · DOI
  10. Hasebe, 2019, J. Astron. Telesc. Inst., 5, 9
  11. Chang, 2002, Optical System Contamination: Effects, Measurements, and Control Vii, 4774, 119
  12. Giulietti A G, 1979, J. Phy. D., 12, 10.1088/0022-3727/12/12/006 · DOI
  13. Lucchesi, 1981, J. Phy. D., 14, 877, 10.1088/0022-3727/14/5/019 · DOI
  14. Duckworth, 2006, AIP Conference Proceedings, 824, 61, 10.1063/1.2192334 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Manjunath Hatti, 2018, IJEDR, 6
  16. Frolec, 2019, Cryogenics, 97, 85, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kralik, 2009, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 7298
  18. Hanzelka, 2008, Cryogenics, 48, 455, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.03.021 · DOI
  19. Musilova, 2005, Cryogenics, 45, 529, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Musilova, 2007, Cryogenics, 47, 257, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hanzelka, 2010, Cryogenics, 50, 331, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.01.007 · DOI
  22. Kralik, 2011, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 82, 10.1063/1.3585985 · DOI
  23. Kralik, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.224302 · DOI
  24. Frolec, 2017, Int. J. Refrig., 82, 51, 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.06.034 · DOI
  25. Tuttle, 2014, Cryogenics, 64, 240, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.04.024 · DOI
  26. Tuttle, 2015, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 102, 10.1088/1757-899X/102/1/012015 · DOI
  27. Franck, 2012, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1434, 1497, 10.1063/1.4707078 · DOI
  28. Jahromi, 2017, IOP Conference Series: Mat. Sci. Eng., 278, 10.1088/1757-899X/278/1/012002 · DOI
  29. Philippe Hervé, 2008, HAL, 48, 463
  30. Woods, 2012, Metrologia, 49, 737, 10.1088/0026-1394/49/6/737 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Woods, 2014, Cryogenics, 60, 44, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Gan, 2019, AOPC 2019: Optical Sensing and Imaging Technology, 11338, 113382Q
  33. Jiayu Ma, 2019, Materials (Basel), 12, 1141, 10.3390/ma12071141 · DOI
  34. Jamotton, 2009, Vacuum, 83, 1244, 10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.03.019 · DOI
  35. Stout, 2014, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy Vi, 9150
  36. Yenni, 2019, Heat and Mass Transf., 55, 1465, 10.1007/s00231-018-2513-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, S. Y., Li, Y., & Li, L. F.
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2022-05-01
Volume
1241
Issue
1
Pages
012050
ISSN
  • 1757-8981
  • 1757-899X
DOI
10.1088/1757-899x/1241/1/012050
Cited by
8
References
0
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review