Cited by 213Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Neuropathological Protection after Traumatic Brain Injury in Intact Female Rats Versus Males or Ovariectomized Females

Bramlett, Helen M., Dietrich, W. Dalton·2001·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

An important consideration in traumatic brain injury (TBI) in females is the influence of hormones on recovery. Recent studies in both cerebral ischemia and TBI have demonstrated an attenuation in both damage and neurologic recovery following hormonal treatment. However, the ability of endogenous hormone levels to provide neuropathological protection after fluid percussion (FP) brain injury has not been studied. The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether endogenous circulating hormones in the female rat could provide neuroprotection compared to males and ovariectomized female animals. Sixty-four Sprague-Dawley rats underwent a moderate (1.7-2.2 atm) right parasagittal FP injury. Intact females (i.e., nonovariectomized) were subjected to injury either during the proestrous (TBI-FP, n = 18) phase of their cycle or nonproestrous (TBI-FNP, n = 19) phase. A separate group of females were ovariectomized (TBI-OVX, n = 10) 10 days prior to FP injury in order to reduce hormone levels. Male animals were also traumatized (TBI-M, n = 17). Appropriate sham controls (Sham-FP, n = 2; Sham-FNP, n = 2; Sham-OVX, n = 2; Sham-M, n = 2) also underwent all aspects of surgery except for the actual FP injury. All groups were sacrificed 3 days following TBI for analysis. Both intact female groups had significantly (p < 0.05) smaller cortical contusions compared to male animals. In addition to this finding, the TBI-FNP group was significantly (p < 0.04) different from the ovariectomized female animals. Ovariectomized rats had larger areas of damage compared to intact females. The TBI-OVX group's cortical contusion volume was similar to male animals. These results provide evidence for endogenous hormonal histopathological protection following parasagittal FP brain injury. The use of hormone therapy after TBI warrants continued exploration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/089771501750451811

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bramlett, H. M., & Dietrich, W. D.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2001-09
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
891-900
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1970991292
Cited by
213
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-30291, P50NS030291)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, fluid percussion injury, sex differences, ovariectomy, endogenous hormones, neuroprotection, estrous cycle, proestrus, cortical contusion, female rats, hormone therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Injuries, Cell Count, Estrogens, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Ovariectomy, Proestrus, Progesterone, Sex Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Recovery of Function, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review