Cited by 719Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Head injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: the evidence 10 years on; a partial replication

Open access
Fleminger, S·2003·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine, using a systematic review of case-control studies, whether head injury is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. We sought to replicate the findings of the meta-analysis of Mortimer et al (1991). METHODS: A predefined inclusion criterion specified case-control studies eligible for inclusion. A comprehensive and systematic search of various electronic databases, up to August 2001, was undertaken. Two independent reviewers screened studies for eligibility. Fifteen case-control studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, of which seven postdated the study of Mortimer et al. RESULTS: We partially replicated the results of Mortimer et al. The meta-analysis of the seven studies conducted since 1991 did not reach significance. However, analysis of all 15 case-control studies was significant (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.06), indicating an excess history of head injury in those with Alzheimer's disease. The finding of Mortimer et al that head injury is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease only in males was replicated. The excess risk of head injury in those with Alzheimer's disease is only found in males (males: OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.06; females: OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for an association between a history of previous head injury and the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.857

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleminger, S.
Affiliations
Maudsley Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Fleminger, S
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
74
Issue
7
Pages
857-862
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975656204
Cited by
719
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer's disease, risk factors, replication, sex differences, case-control study
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Female, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review