Cited by 172Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMedication Adherence and ComplianceBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Moderators and mediators of long-term adherence to stimulant treatment in children with ADHD

THIRUCHELVAM, DEVATHARSHNY, CHARACH, ALICE, SCHACHAR, RUSSELL J.·2001·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To identify moderators and mediators of long-term adherence to stimulant medication in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Method Seventy-one children with ADHD were prescribed methylphenidate, followed prospectively on an annual basis for 3 years, and evaluated for adherence to stimulant treatment. The study occurred in Toronto between 1993 and 1997. Adherents were those who took methylphenidate, or another psychostimulant, for 5 or more days per week throughout the follow-up period, except for "drug holidays." Children who adhered at consecutive evaluations were compared with those who did not. Severity of ADHD, presence of oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder, learning difficulties, anxiety, age, family dysfunction, and socioeconomic adversity at baseline were investigated as moderators of adherence. Response to treatment at school, measured at 12 months, was investigated as a mediator of adherence.Results Fifty-two percent of children adhered to stimulant treatment for 3 years. Absence of teacher-rated oppositional defiant disorder, more teacher-rated ADHD symptoms, and younger age at baseline predicted adherence.Conclusions Adherence to stimulant medications is a significant factor in the long-term treatment of children with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200108000-00014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
THIRUCHELVAM, D., CHARACH, A., & SCHACHAR, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
SCHACHAR, RUSSELL J.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
922-928
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061256954
Cited by
172
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, children, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, ADHD symptom severity, age at baseline, socioeconomic adversity, family dysfunction, learning difficulties, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Educational Measurement, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Patient Compliance, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review