Cited by 101Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

PTSD Elderly War Veterans: A Clinical Controlled Pilot Study

Gamito, Pedro, Oliveira, Jorge, Rosa, Pedro, Morais, Diogo, Duarte, Nuno, Oliveira, Susana, Saraiva, Tomaz·2010·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Around 25,000 war veterans in Portugal suffer posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This clinically controlled study evaluates virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) as an alternative procedure to reduce PTSD symptoms. Ten patients were assigned to three groups: VRET, exposure in imagination (EI), and waiting list (WL). The patients were Portuguese veterans from a series of wars fought in former African colonies more than 30 years ago. While the EI group participated in traditional imagination therapy, the VRET group was exposed to a virtual reality (VR) war scenario. Cues such as ambush, mortar blasting, and waiting for rescue were used in the VR. Patients enrolled in the VRET group showed statistical reduction of PTSD-associated disorders like depression and anxiety. Far from being conclusive, this pilot study nonetheless presents some promising data on the use of VRET on old war veteran populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2009.0237

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gamito, P., Oliveira, J., Rosa, P., Morais, D., Duarte, N., Oliveira, S., & Saraiva, T.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias (PT)
  • Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
  • APOIAR, Lisbon, Portugal.
Corresponding author
Gamito, Pedro
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2010-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2093108967
Cited by
101
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • COPELABS Scientific commons (Universidade Lusófona) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nvidia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, war veterans, older veterans, virtual reality exposure therapy, exposure therapy, depression, anxiety
MeSH terms
Aged, Combat Disorders, Computer Simulation, Humans, Imagination, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Portugal, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, User-Computer Interface, Veterans, Warfare, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review