Cited by 19Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild Development and Digital Technology

Internet-Risk Classes of Adolescents, Dispositional Mindfulness and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Mediational Model

Calvete, Esther, Fernández-González, Liria, González-Cabrera, Joaquín, Machimbarrena, J. Manuel, Orue, Izaskun·2020·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

This study was primarily aimed at identifying classes of adolescents in relation to their probability of endorsing several risks associated with the Internet (cyberbullying victimization and perpetration, cyberdating abuse victimization, and perpetration, sexting, and grooming). The second objective was to examine a mediational model linking dispositional mindfulness, risk perception, exposure to antisocial content in the media, Internet-risk classes of adolescents, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The sample comprised 3,076 adolescents (46.2% boys, ages between 12 and 21). Latent class analyses indicated the existence of five classes related to the probability of endorsing Internet risks: No risk (60.75%), only cyberbullying (25.5%), cyberbullying and cyberdating abuse (6.7%), all risks (4.3%), and sexual risk (2.9%). Three mindfulness facets, namely, acting with awareness, nonreacting, and nonjudging, were associated with all the classes of risks. This association was partially explained by the degree of exposure to antisocial content in the media and risk perception. Finally, membership in the Internet-risk classes was associated with a lower HRQL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2019.0705

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further studies revealed that cybergrooming victimization might negatively affect mental well-being, for example, in terms of lower health-related quality of life and negative emotional impact.

    “Further studies revealed that cybergrooming victimization might negatively affect mental well-being, for example, in terms of lower health-related quality of life (Calvete et al., 2020; Ortega-Barón et al., 2022) and negative emotional impact (Finkelhor et al., 2023).”
  • Dispositional mindfulness and risk perception were investigated as protective factors for cybergrooming victimization, but negative correlations were found only with some facets of dispositional mindfulness.

    “Dispositional mindfulness and risk perception were investigated as protective factors for cybergrooming victimization, but negative correlations were found only with some facets of dispositional mindfulness (Calvete et al., 2020).”
  • The three studies that assessed both (cyber)bullying victimization and perpetration showed a strong tendency for cybergrooming victimization to be more closely related to (cyber)bullying victimization than perpetration.

    “The three studies that assessed both (cyber)bullying victimization and perpetration (Calvete et al., 2021a-Study 2; Calvete et al., 2020; Wachs et al., 2015) showed a strong tendency for cybergrooming victimization to be more closely related to (cyber)bullying victimization than perpetration.”
  • Cybergrooming victimization or sexual solicitation but not sexual interaction was positively associated with cyber dating abuse perpetration.

    “Additionally, cybergrooming victimization or sexual solicitation but not sexual interaction was positively associated with cyber dating abuse perpetration (Calvete et al., 2020, 2023).”
  • A positive correlation between cybergrooming victimization and cyber dating abuse victimization was found.

    “For example, a positive correlation between cybergrooming victimization and cyber dating abuse victimization was found (Calvete et al., 2020, 2023; Machimbarrena et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L., González-Cabrera, J., Machimbarrena, J. M., & Orue, I.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Deusto (ES)
  • Department of Personality, Psychological Assessment, and Treatment, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Department of Educational Psychology and Psychobiology, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, Logroño, Spain.
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Corresponding author
Calvete, Esther
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2020-08-01
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
533-540
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W3022322739
Cited by
19
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Re-Unir (International University of La Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
online risks, adolescents, cyberbullying, sexting, online grooming, trait mindfulness, health-related quality of life, risk perception, latent class analysis, mediation
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Quality of Life, Risk Assessment, Internet, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review