Cited by 60Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

Clinical Implications of Accuracy Measurements of Continuous Glucose Sensors

Open access
Bailey, Timothy S.·2017·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

The accuracy of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) now supports its use by persons with diabetes and clinicians caring for them. This article reviews measures of CGM accuracy, factors contributing to accuracy, comparative accuracy assessment, clinical implications of CGM sensor accuracy, and recent clinical trials that have demonstrated the utility of CGMs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2017.0050

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimally invasive continuous glucose monitors have been clinically validated but are difficult to embed in consumer-grade wearables and mostly function as a stand-alone product.

    “One example of biochemical sensors are the minimally invasive continuous glucose monitors that have been clinically validated but are difficult to embed in consumer-grade wearables and mostly function as a stand-alone product31.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Colwell JA, Dudley JD, McDonald JM, et al.: Consensus Statement on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:95-99.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, T. S.
Affiliations
AMCR Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Bailey, Timothy S.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2017-05
Volume
19
Issue
2_suppl
Pages
S51-S54
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2619117035
Cited by
60
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, CGM accuracy, diabetes management, accuracy assessment, clinical trials
MeSH terms
Data Accuracy, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review