Cited by 71Educational Games and GamificationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Exploring elements of fun to motivate youth to do cognitive bias modification

Open access
Boendermaker, Wouter J., Boffo, Marilisa, Wiers, Reinout W.·2015·Games for Health Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Heavy drinking among young adults poses severe health risks, including development of later addiction problems. Cognitive retraining of automatic appetitive processes related to alcohol (so-called cognitive bias modification [CBM]) may help to prevent escalation of use. Although effective as a treatment in clinical patients, the use of CBM in youth proves more difficult, as motivation in this group is typically low, and the paradigms used are often viewed as boring and tedious. This article presents two separate studies that focused on three approaches that may enhance user experience and motivation to train: a serious game, a serious game in a social networking context, and a mobile application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the Game Study, 77 participants performed a regular CBM training, aimed at response matching, a gamified version, or a placebo version of that training. The gamified version was presented as a stand-alone game or in the context of a social network. In the Mobile Study, 64 participants completed a different CBM training, aimed at approach bias, either on a computer or on their mobile device. RESULTS: Although no training effects were found in the Game Study, adding (social) game elements did increase aspects of the user experience and motivation to train. The mobile training appeared to increase motivation to train in terms how often participants trained, but this effect disappeared after controlling for baseline motivation to train. CONCLUSIONS: Adding (social) game elements can increase motivation to train, and mobile training did not underperform compared with the regular training in this sample, which warrants more research into motivational elements for CBM training in younger audiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/g4h.2015.0053

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boendermaker et al. (2015) found no difference in effectiveness between a web-based and mobile gamified cognitive bias modification training for alcohol use.

    “Boendermaker et al. (2015) found no difference in effectiveness between a web-based and mobile gamified cognitive bias modification training for alcohol use”

    From Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature (2016) · cites this paper as Boendermaker et al. (2015)

    The Discussion (p. 9) says training effects did not substantially differ between the computer and mobile conditions, and that mobile training did not perform worse in this sample. But the paper studied gamification in a separate Game Study; it did not compare web-based and mobile gamified training. The authors also describe effectiveness as preliminary and note that the Mobile Study lacked a placebo control. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Boendermaker et al. (2015) observed a positive impact on motivation to train with a gamified (avatar and backstory) application designed to moderate alcohol use, but participants reported greater task demand.

    “Boendermaker et al. (2015) observed a positive impact on motivation to train; however, participants reported greater task demand associated with the gamified version of the application.”

    From Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature (2016) · cites this paper as Boendermaker et al. (2015)

  • Social interaction was found to increase user experiences of fun and motivation in moderating alcohol consumption, to have a positive influence on physical activity, and on flourishing mental health.

    “Social Interaction was also commonly employed as a means to engage users and was found to increase user experiences of fun and motivation in the context of moderating alcohol consumption (Boendermaker et al., 2015), to have a positive influence on physical activity (Juho Hamari and Koivisto, 2015, Maher et al., 2015, Spillers and Asimakopoulos, 2014) and flourishing mental health (Hall et al., 201”

    From Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature (2016) · cites this paper as Boendermaker et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [17]17. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The effects of alcohol on physiological processes and biological development. Alcohol Res Health 2005; 28:125-131.
  2. [25]25. Kraus AA, Hofmann W. Getting in touch with motivation: The Swipe Approach-Avoidance Procedure (SwAAP). In: Kraus A, ed. Indirect Procedures for the Measurement of Approach-Avoidance Motivation [PhD thesis]. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University; 2014: 176-198.
  3. [42]42. Pronk T, Van Deursen D, Beraha E, et al. Validation of the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set: A controlled picture set for cognitive bias measurement and modification paradigms. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2015 (in press).
  4. [43]43. Rauschenberger M, Schrepp M, Olschner S, et al. Measurement of user experience: A Spanish language version of the User Experience Questionaire (UEQ). In: 2012 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Vol. 1 . New York: IEEE; 2012: 471-476.
  5. [47]47. Enock PM, Hofmann SG, McNally RJ. Attention bias modification training via smartphone to reduce social anxiety: A randomized, controlled multi-session experiment. Cogn Ther Res 2014; 38:200-216. Address correspondence to: Wouter J. Boendermaker, MSc Department of Developmental Psychology University of Amsterdam Weesperplein 4 1018 XA Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: w.j.boendermaker@uva.nl

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boendermaker, W. J., Boffo, M., & Wiers, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Games for Health Journal
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
434-443
ISSN
  • 2161-783X (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-7856
OpenAlex
W2151883930
Cited by
71
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
16.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Games for Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (314-99-102, 453‐08‐001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
cognitive bias modification, gamification, serious games, social networking, mobile application, motivation, youth, heavy drinking, alcohol prevention, approach bias, user experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Association Learning, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, Young Adult, Pleasure, Binge Drinking, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review