Cited by 69Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFlavonoids in Medical ResearchAntioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea

Dietary Luteolin Reduces Proinflammatory Microglia in the Brain of Senescent Mice

Open access
Burton, Michael D., Rytych, Jennifer L., Amin, Ravi, Johnson, Rodney W.·2016·Rejuvenation Research

Abstract

Brain microglia become dysregulated during aging and express proinflammatory cytokines that play a role in cognitive aging. Recent studies suggest the flavonoid luteolin reduces neuroinflammation and improves learning and memory in aged mice. However, if dietary luteolin reduces microglia activity in the brain of senescent mice is not known. We hypothesized that feeding aged mice a diet with luteolin would reduce microglia activity. Adult (3-6 months) and aged (22-24 months) mice were fed American Institute of Nutrition (AIN)-93M or AIN-93M with luteolin (6 g/kg) for 4 weeks and injected intraperitoneally with saline or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) before microglia were isolated and stained for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 for flow cytometry. In saline-treated mice fed control diet, aging increased the proportion of microglia that stained for MHC class II (<3% for adults vs. 23% for aged), IL-1β (<2% for adults vs. 25% for aged), and IL-6 (<2% for adults vs. 25% for aged), indicating an age-related increase in proinflammatory microglia. In saline-treated aged mice fed luteolin, the proportion of microglia that stained for MHC class II, IL-1β, and IL-6 was reduced by nearly half (to 12%, 13%, and 12%, respectively). Interestingly, luteolin significantly reduced the proportion of microglia that stained for IL-1β and IL-6 in LPS-treated adult mice but not aged. Collectively, the results show that a diet supplemented with luteolin inhibited brain microglia activity during aging and activation by LPS in adults. Therefore, luteolin may inhibit neuroinflammation and improve cognition in the otherwise healthy aged by constraining brain microglia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/rej.2015.1708

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burton, M. D., Rytych, J. L., Amin, R., & Johnson, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Rodney W.
Venue
Rejuvenation Research
Published
2016-08
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
286-292
ISSN
  • 1094-5458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1684
  • 1557-8577
OpenAlex
W1663431763
Cited by
69
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rejuvenation Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (AG16710)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Flavonoids in Medical Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea
Keywords
luteolin, dietary flavonoids, microglia, neuroinflammation, brain aging, cognitive aging, IL-1β, interleukin-6, MHC class II, lipopolysaccharide, microglial activation, aged mice
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aging, Animals, Animal Feed, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Brain, Diet, Endotoxins, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Cytokines, Microglia, Inflammation Mediators, Dietary Supplements, Models, Animal, Luteolin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review