Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

UNC-11, a Caenorhabditis elegans AP180 Homologue, Regulates the Size and Protein Composition of Synaptic Vesicles

Nonet, Michael L., Holgado, Andrea M., Brewer, Faraha, Serpe, Craig J., Norbeck, Betty A., Holleran, Julianne, Wei, Liping, Hartwieg, Erika, Jorgensen, Erik M., Alfonso, Aixa·1999·Molecular Biology of the Cell

Abstract

The unc-11 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans encodes multiple isoforms of a protein homologous to the mammalian brain-specific clathrin-adaptor protein AP180. The UNC-11 protein is expressed at high levels in the nervous system and at lower levels in other tissues. In neurons, UNC-11 is enriched at presynaptic terminals but is also present in cell bodies. unc-11mutants are defective in two aspects of synaptic vesicle biogenesis. First, the SNARE protein synaptobrevin is mislocalized, no longer being exclusively localized to synaptic vesicles. The reduction of synaptobrevin at synaptic vesicles is the probable cause of the reduced neurotransmitter release observed in these mutants. Second,unc-11 mutants accumulate large vesicles at synapses. We propose that the UNC-11 protein mediates two functions during synaptic vesicle biogenesis: it recruits synaptobrevin to synaptic vesicle membranes and it regulates the size of the budded vesicle during clathrin coat assembly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1091/mbc.10.7.2343

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Ahle S., 1986, EMBO J., 5, 3143, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04621.x · DOI
  2. Albertson D.G., 1984, Dev. Biol., 101, 61, 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90117-9 · DOI
  3. Alfonso A., 1994, J. Neurosci., 14, 2290, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02290.1994 · DOI
  4. Artalejo C.R., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 8328, 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8328 · DOI
  5. Avery L., 1993, J. Exp. Biol., 175, 283, 10.1242/jeb.175.1.283 · DOI
  6. Avery L., 1993, Genetics, 133, 897, 10.1093/genetics/133.4.897 · DOI
  7. Barstead R.J., 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 10177, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)81782-3 · DOI
  8. Barton M.K., 1990, Genetics, 125, 29, 10.1093/genetics/125.1.29 · DOI
  9. Beck K.A., 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 4442, 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)64342-3 · DOI
  10. Bennett M.K., 1992, J. Cell Biol., 116, 761, 10.1083/jcb.116.3.761 · DOI
  11. Blumenthal T., 1995, Trends Genet., 11, 132, 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)89026-5 · DOI
  12. Brenner S., 1974, Genetics, 77, 71, 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71 · DOI
  13. Broadie K., 1995, Neuron, 15, 663, 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90154-X · DOI
  14. C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, 1998, Science, 282, 2012, 10.1126/science.282.5396.2012 · DOI
  15. Cremona O., 1997, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 7, 323, 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80059-1 · DOI
  16. Dreyling M.H., 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 4804, 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4804 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Duerr J.S., 1999, J. Neurosci., 19, 72, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-01-00072.1999 · DOI
  18. Faundez V., 1998, Cell, 93, 423, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81170-8 · DOI
  19. Fesce R., 1994, Trends Cell Biol., 4, 1, 10.1016/0962-8924(94)90025-6 · DOI
  20. Gaidarov I., 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 20922, 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20922 · DOI
  21. Gaidarov I., 1999, EMBO J., 18, 871, 10.1093/emboj/18.4.871 · DOI
  22. Gonzalez-Gaitan M., 1997, Cell, 88, 767, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81923-6 · DOI
  23. Hall D.H., 1991, Cell, 65, 837, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90391-B · DOI
  24. Hanson P.I., 1997, Cell, 90, 523, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80512-7 · DOI
  25. Hao W., 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 6393, 10.1074/jbc.272.10.6393 · DOI
  26. Hosono R., 1991, Neurosci. Lett., 128, 243, 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90270-4 · DOI
  27. Hunt J.M., 1994, Neuron, 12, 1269, 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90443-X · DOI
  28. Kohtz D.S., 1988, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 7418, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68658-2 · DOI
  29. Kramer J.M., 1990, Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 2081, 10.1128/MCB.10.5.2081 · DOI
  30. Li H., 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 5912, 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5912 · DOI
  31. Matthews G., 1996, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 19, 219, 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.001251 · DOI
  32. McIntire S.L., 1992, Neuron, 8, 307, 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90297-Q · DOI
  33. McIntire S.L., 1993, Nature, 364, 337, 10.1038/364337a0 · DOI
  34. Mello C.C., 1991, EMBO J., 10, 3959, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04966.x · DOI
  35. Miller K.G., 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 12593, 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12593 · DOI
  36. Morris S.A., 1993, EMBO J., 12, 667, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05700.x · DOI
  37. Nguyen M., 1995, Genetics, 140, 527, 10.1093/genetics/140.2.527 · DOI
  38. Nonet M.L., 1993, Cell, 73, 1291, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90357-V · DOI
  39. Nonet M.L., 1991, Nature, 351, 65, 10.1038/351065a0 · DOI
  40. Nonet M.L., 1998, J. Neurosci., 18, 70, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00070.1998 · DOI
  41. Nonet M.L., 1997, J. Neurosci., 17, 8021, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-21-08061.1997 · DOI
  42. Norris F.A., 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 214, 10.1074/jbc.270.1.214 · DOI
  43. Palfrey H.C., 1998, Neuroscience, 83, 969, 10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00453-3 · DOI
  44. Poodry C., 1979, J. Cell Biol., 81, 520, 10.1083/jcb.81.3.520 · DOI
  45. Puszkin S., 1992, Mol. Neurobiol., 6, 253, 10.1007/BF02780557 · DOI
  46. Raizen D.M., 1994, Neuron, 12, 483, 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90207-0 · DOI
  47. Raizen D.M., 1995, Genetics, 141, 1365, 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1365 · DOI
  48. Rapoport I., 1997, EMBO J., 16, 2240, 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2240 · DOI
  49. Rosenzweig B., 1983, Nucleic Acids Res., 11, 4201, 10.1093/nar/11.12.4201 · DOI
  50. 10.1091/mbc.9.6.1235 · DOI
  51. Salcini A., 1997, Genes Dev., 11, 2239, 10.1101/gad.11.17.2239 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Schiavo G., 1992, Nature, 359, 832, 10.1038/359832a0 · DOI
  53. Schmid S.L., 1997, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 66, 511, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.511 · DOI
  54. Smith D., 1984, J. Cell Biol., 99, 20, 10.1083/jcb.99.1.20 · DOI
  55. Sollner T., 1993, Cell, 75, 409, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90376-2 · DOI
  56. Sollner T., 1993, Nature, 362, 318, 10.1038/362318a0 · DOI
  57. Stenius K., 1995, J Cell. Biol., 131, 1801, 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1801 · DOI
  58. Südhof T.C., 1995, Nature, 375, 645, 10.1038/375645a0 · DOI
  59. Walch-Solimena C., 1995, J. Cell Biol., 128, 637, 10.1083/jcb.128.4.637 · DOI
  60. Wang L.-H., 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 260, 10079, 10.1074/jbc.270.17.10079 · DOI
  61. Weber T., 1998, Cell, 92, 759, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81404-X · DOI
  62. Wendland B., 1998, J. Cell Biol., 141, 71, 10.1083/jcb.141.1.71 · DOI
  63. Ye W., 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 1564, 10.1074/jbc.270.4.1564 · DOI
  64. Ye W., 1995, J. Neurosci. Res., 41, 15, 10.1002/jnr.490410104 · DOI
  65. Ye W., 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 10933, 10.1074/jbc.270.18.10933 · DOI
  66. Zhang B., 1998, Neuron, 21, 1465, 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80664-9 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Zhang J.Z., 1994, Cell, 78, 751, 10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90442-1 · DOI
  68. Zhou S., 1993, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 12655, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)31438-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nonet, M. L., Holgado, A. M., Brewer, F., Serpe, C. J., Norbeck, B. A., Holleran, J., Wei, L., Hartwieg, E., Jorgensen, E. M., & Alfonso, A.
Venue
Molecular Biology of the Cell
Published
1999-07
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
2343-2360
ISSN
  • 1059-1524
  • 1939-4586
Cited by
235
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review