The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 192 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Luck
Abstract
One of the key supposed ‘platitudes’ of contemporary epistemology is the claim that knowledge excludes luck. One can see the attraction of such a claim, in that knowledge is something that one can take credit for; it is an achievement of sorts, and yet luck undermines genuine achievements. The problem, however, is that luck seems to be an all-pervasive feature of our epistemic enterprises that tempts us to think that either scepticism is true, and we don’t know very much after all, or else knowledge is compatible with knowledge after all. My claim is that we do not need to choose between these two austere alternatives, since a closer inspection of what is involved in the notion of epistemic luck reveals varieties of luck that are compatible with knowledge possession and varieties that aren’t. We can thus do justice to the intuition that knowledge is compatible with (some forms of) luck without acceding to the sceptical claim that we do not know as much as we think we do. Nevertheless, I also claim that there is a sceptical problem lurking in the background that is related to the problem of epistemic luck, though it is not best thought of in terms of the possession of knowledge.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Safety Requirement S knows that p only if there are no nearby worlds in which (i) she does not have a correct belief as to whether p and (ii) she uses the same method of beliefformation as the one we actually used to determine whether p is true.”
From Hope for the Evolutionary Debunker: How Evolutionary Debunking Arguments and Arguments from Moral Disagreement Can Join Forces (2022) · cites this paper as Pritchard 2005
Citations
Cites
Putnam, H. (1981) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625398 · Cited by 5,688
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Williamson, T. L. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925656x.001.0001 · Cited by 2,788
Empiricism and the philosophy of mind
Sellars, W. (1997) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 2,727
Scorekeeping in a language game
Lewis, D. (1979) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/bf00258436 · Cited by 2,478
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes
Descartes, R. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818998 · Cited by 2,230
Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge
Goldman, A. I. (1976) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2025679 · Cited by 1,886
Plantinga, A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/0195078640.001.0001 · Cited by 1,703
Lewis, D. (1996) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048409612347521 · Cited by 1,450
Research works printed but not linked: 96
- Annis,, 1978, A Contextualist Theory of Justification, American Philosophical Quarterly
- Austin,, 1961, Philosophical Papers
- 2000, Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology
- Ayer,, 1956, The Problem of Knowledge
- Bach,, 2004, Contextualism in Philosophy: On Epistemology, Language and Truth
- Brandom,, 1994, Making It Explicit
- 1992, Semantic Answers to Skepticism, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
- 1983, The Skeptical Tradition
- Chisholm,, 1989, Theory of Knowledge
- 1987, Epistemic Responsibility
- Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- 2000, New Essays on the A Priori
- 1999, Epistemology
- Sosa and His Critics
- Diogenes, 1925, Lives of the Philosophers
- 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information
- Duff,, 1996, Criminal Attempts
- 1987, A Theory of Epistemic Rationality
- Essays in Ancient Philosophy
- 1995, Metaepistemology and Skepticism
- 1979, Justification and Knowledge
- 1986, Epistemology and Cognition
- 1999, Agent Reliabilism, Philosophical Perspectives
- 2002, Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology
- Grice,, 1989, Studies in the Way of Words
- Harman,, 1973, Thought
- 1986, Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson
- 1987, The Possibility of Knowledge
- 2003, The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays
- Kvanvig,, 1992, The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind: On the Place of the Virtues in Contemporary Epistemology
- Loux,, 1979, The Possible and the Actual
- 1986, Subject, Thought, and Context
- Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony
- Mind and World
- 2002, Scepticism and Interpretation
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- 1939, Proof of an External World, Proceedings of the British Academy
- 1959, Philosophical Papers
- Nagel,, 1976, Moral Luck, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
- 1979, Mortal Questions
- 1986, The View from Nowhere
- Nuccetelli,, 2003, New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge
- Doubt Undogmatized: Pyrrhonian Scepticism, Epistemological Externalism, and the ‘Metaepistemological’ Challenge, Principia—Revista Internacional de Epistemologia
- Is ‘God Exists’ a ‘Hinge’ Proposition of Religious Belief?, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
- Understanding Scepticism, Sats—Nordic Journal of Philosophy
- Wittgenstein-Jahrbuch 2001/2002
- Essays in Philosophy
- Recent Work on Radical Skepticism, American Philosophical Quarterly
- Epistemic Deflationism, Southern Journal of Philosophy
- Epistemic Luck, Journal of Philosophical Research
- Contextualism,, 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2001.tb00223.x · DOI
- Investigating On Certainty
- 2006, Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology
- 1992, Renewing Philosophy
- Quine,, 1953, From a Logical Point of View
- 1949, Theory of Probability
- Rescher,, 1993, Moral Luck
- 1995, Luck: The Brilliant Randomness of Everyday Life
- Richards,, 1993, Moral Luck
- Russell,, 1948, Human Knowledge: Its Scope and its Limits
- Sedley,, 1983, The Skeptical Tradition
- Sextus, Sextus Empiricus with an English Translation
- Slote,, 1979, Papers on Language and Logic
- 1994, Philosophical Scepticism and Epistemic Circularity, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
- 1997, Mythology of the Given, History of Philosophy Quarterly
- 1999, How to Defeat Opposition to Moore, Philosophical Perspectives
- 2002, The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology
- Moral Luck, 10.1111/j.1467-9329.1991.tb00036.x · DOI
- Moral Luck, 10.1111/j.1467-9329.1991.tb00036.x · DOI
- 2002, Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue
- Swain,, 1974, Epistemic Defeasibility, American Philosophical Quarterly
- Thomson,, 1993, Moral Luck
- 2005, The Legacy of Cook Wilson, Philosophical Quarterly
- 1974, An Argument for Skepticism, Philosophical Exchange
- 1975, Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism
- 1984, Philosophical Relativity
- 1999, The New Relevant Alternatives Theory, Philosophical Perspectives
- 2004, Varieties of Skepticism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 1978, Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry
- Moral Luck, 10.1017/CBO9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1983, The Skeptical Tradition
- 1993, Moral Luck
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- 1991, Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism
- 1999, Epistemology
- Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology
- Wittgenstein and Scepticism
- Scepticism, Semantic Externalism and Keith's Mom, Southern Journal of Philosophy
- Wittgenstein,, 1969, On Certainty
- Wright,, 1985, Facts and Certainty, Proceedings of the British Academy
- 1992, Truth and Objectivity
- 1994, Reading Putnam
- New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge
- Wittgenstein and Scepticism
- 1999, Epistemology
- Zimmerman,, 1993, Moral Luck
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is Understanding A Species Of Knowledge?
Grimm, S. R. (2006) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axl015 · Cited by 468
Pritchard, D. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7 · Cited by 408
Self-citationWhy we don’t deserve credit for everything we know
Lackey, J. A. (2006) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9044-x · Cited by 391
Knowledge, Understanding and Epistemic Value
Pritchard, D. (2009) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246109000046 · Cited by 253
Self-citationTHE NATURE OF ABILITY AND THE PURPOSE OF KNOWLEDGE
Greco, J. (2007) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2007.00122.x · Cited by 243
Pritchard, D. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0013 · Cited by 207
Self-citationCognitive ability and the extended cognition thesis
Pritchard, D. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9738-y · Cited by 202
Self-citationGoogle Morals, Virtue, and the Asymmetry of Deference
Howell, R. J. (2012) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00873.x · Cited by 194
Justifications, Excuses, and Sceptical Scenarios
Williamson, T. L. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191982439.003.0009 · Cited by 168
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement
Miller, B. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0225-5 · Cited by 164
Kvanvig, J. L. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231188.003.0005 · Cited by 159
Intuitions, Counter-Examples, and Experimental Philosophy
Deutsch, M. (2010) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0033-0 · Cited by 155
Why epistemologists are so down on their luck
Riggs, W. D. (2006) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9043-y · Cited by 154
Greco, J. (2020) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560818 · Cited by 159
Lackey, J. A. (2008) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9304-3 · Cited by 152
Ganeri, J. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199202416.001.0001 · Cited by 148
Lackey, J. A. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400801886207 · Cited by 140
Wittgenstein and the groundlessness of our believing
Pritchard, D. (2011) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-011-0057-8 · Cited by 136
Self-citationEpistemic dependence and collective scientific knowledge
de Ridder, J. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0283-3 · Cited by 134
Pritchard, D. (2015) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12142 · Cited by 130
Self-citationBogardus, T. (2012) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00564.x · Cited by 128
THE LEGEND OF THE JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF ANALYSIS
Dutant, J. (2015) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12061 · Cited by 126
Single premise deduction and risk
Lasonen‐Aarnio, M. (2007) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9157-1 · Cited by 125
Anti-luck epistemology and the Gettier problem
Pritchard, D. (2014) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0374-0 · Cited by 124
Self-citationSensitivity, Safety, and Antiluck Epistemology
Pritchard, D. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195183214.003.0021 · Cited by 121
Self-citationIntuitive expertise and intuitions about knowledge
Horvath, J., & Wiegmann, A. (2016) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0627-1 · Cited by 129
Pritchard, D. (2014) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12103 · Cited by 113
Self-citationKnowledge‐How and Epistemic Luck
Carter, J. A., & Pritchard, D. (2013) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12054 · Cited by 111
Self-citationTurri, J., Buckwalter, W., & Blouw, P. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0683-5 · Cited by 111
Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Twin Earth
Kallestrup, J., & Pritchard, D. (2011) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00495.x · Cited by 110
Self-citationPoston, T. (2009) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00301.x · Cited by 110
Riggs, W. D. (2008) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9342-6 · Cited by 106
Littlejohn, C. (2014) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2014.24 · Cited by 105
Apt performance and epistemic value
Pritchard, D. (2009) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9340-7 · Cited by 104
Self-citationCarter, J. A., Kallestrup, J., Palermos, S. O., & Pritchard, D. (2014) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12026 · Cited by 107
Self-citationCoffman, E. J. (2006) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9046-8 · Cited by 104
10 On Being Justified in One's Head
Williamson, T. L. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311952.003.0010 · Cited by 99
Transparency and the KK Principle
Das, N., & Salow, B. (2016) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12158 · Cited by 97
Kelp, C. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2012.673726 · Cited by 95
What do we Aim At When we Believe?
McHugh, C. (2011) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01270.x · Cited by 91
Worries about Pritchard’s safety
Greco, J. (2006) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9040-1 · Cited by 90
Pritchard, D. (2016) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12280 · Cited by 90
Self-citationRevisionary intellectualism and Gettier
Cath, Y. (2014) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0263-y · Cited by 89
Robust Virtue Epistemology As Anti‐Luck Epistemology: A New Solution
Carter, J. A. (2014) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12040 · Cited by 86
Srinivasan, A. (2020) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-8311261 · Cited by 98
Moss, S. J. (2013) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-1728705 · Cited by 86
McGlynn, A. (2011) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00843.x · Cited by 79
Beddor, B., & Pavese, C. (2018) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12562 · Cited by 77
What Is the Benacerraf Problem?
Clarke‐Doane, J. (2016) · Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45980-6_2 · Cited by 76
Amodal completion and knowledge
Helton, G., & Nánay, B. (2018) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/any063 · Cited by 75
Contingency Anxiety and the Epistemology of Disagreement
Mogensen, A. L. (2015) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12099 · Cited by 73
Skill in epistemology I: Skill and knowledge
Pavese, C. (2016) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12359 · Cited by 73
Pavese, C. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1823-7 · Cited by 73
Good Night, and Good Luck: Perspectives on Luck in Management Scholarship
Liu, C., & de Rond, M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1120971 · Cited by 73
Knowledge without credit, exhibit 4: extended cognition
Vaesen, K. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9744-0 · Cited by 72
Hiller, A., & Neta, R. (2006) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9041-0 · Cited by 72
Epistemic Closure and Epistemic Logic I: Relevant Alternatives and Subjunctivism
Holliday, W. H. (2014) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/s10992-013-9306-2 · Cited by 71
Ballantyne, N. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9747-x · Cited by 70
Global safety: how to deal with necessary truths
Hirvelä, J. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1511-z · Cited by 68
The example of the IPCC does not vindicate the Value Free Ideal: a reply to Gregor Betz
John, S. D. (2014) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0095-4 · Cited by 67
Baker‐Hytch, M., & Benton, M. A. (2015) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12056 · Cited by 67
Authorship and ChatGPT: a Conservative View
van Woudenberg, R., Ranalli, C., & Bracker, D. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00715-1 · Cited by 65
Sauder, M. (2020) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275120941178 · Cited by 71
Knowledge, Practical Knowledge, and Intentional Action
Shepherd, J., & Carter, J. A. (2023) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.2277 · Cited by 64
WHY (SOME) KNOWLEDGE IS THE PROPERTY OF A COMMUNITY AND POSSIBLY NONE OF ITS MEMBERS
Miller, B. (2015) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqv025 · Cited by 63
Lottery judgments: A philosophical and experimental study
Ebert, P. A., Smith, M., & Durbach, I. N. (2017) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2017.1367767 · Cited by 63
Luzzi, F. (2009) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400903341770 · Cited by 63
Knowledge‐How and Cognitive Achievement
Carter, J. A., & Pritchard, D. (2014) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12094 · Cited by 63
Self-citationWhy safety doesn’t save closure
Alspector‐Kelly, M. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9755-x · Cited by 62
THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE FROM FALSEHOOD
Schnee, I. (2014) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2014.26 · Cited by 59
Saving safety from counterexamples
Grundmann, T. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1677-z · Cited by 59
Relevance and risk: How the relevant alternatives framework models the epistemology of risk
Gardiner, G. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02668-2 · Cited by 59
Counter Closure and Knowledge Despite Falsehood
Ball, B., & Blome‐Tillmann, M. (2014) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqu033 · Cited by 58
A New Paradigm for Epistemology From Reliabilism to Abilism
Turri, J. (2016) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.008 · Cited by 58
Perspectives and good dispositions
Lasonen‐Aarnio, M. (2024) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.13078 · Cited by 58
The Gettier-illusion: Gettier-partialism and infallibilism
Hetherington, S. (2011) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9924-6 · Cited by 57
Knowledge, Cognitive Achievement, and Environmental Luck
Jarvis, B. W. (2013) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12012 · Cited by 56
Hofmann, F. (2014) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12030 · Cited by 56
Epistemic luck and the generality problem
Becker, K. (2007) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9122-z · Cited by 56
Luck, propositional perception, and the Entailment Thesis
Ranalli, C. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0323-z · Cited by 56
Coffman, E. J. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9178-5 · Cited by 56
Luck as Risk and the Lack of Control Account of Luck
Broncano‐Berrocal, F. (2015) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12114 · Cited by 55
Realism, perspectivism, and disagreement in science
Massimi, M. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02500-6 · Cited by 55
Experimental philosophy and the method of cases
Horvath, J., & Koch, S. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12716 · Cited by 55
UNDERSTANDING, GRASPING AND LUCK
Khalifa, K. (2013) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2013.6 · Cited by 55
VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY AND EPISTEMIC LUCK, REVISITED
Pritchard, D. (2008) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2008.00522.x · Cited by 55
Self-citationWhen cognition turns vicious: Heuristics and biases in light of virtue epistemology
Samuelson, P. L., & Church, I. M. (2015) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2014.904197 · Cited by 52
Combating Anti Anti-Luck Epistemology
Madison, B. J. C. (2010) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400903524375 · Cited by 52
Knowledge, Justification and Normative Coincidence1
Smith, M. J. (2012) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00605.x · Cited by 52
Carter, J. A., Jarvis, B. W., & Rubin, K. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0846-6 · Cited by 52
Relevant Alternatives, Perceptual Knowledge and Discrimination
Pritchard, D. (2010) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00739.x · Cited by 52
Self-citationRiggs, W. D. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231188.003.0010 · Cited by 51
Why Every Theory of Luck is Wrong
Hales, S. D. (2014) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12076 · Cited by 49
Turri, J. (2015) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12218 · Cited by 48
No Luck With Knowledge? On a Dogma of Epistemology
Baumann, P. (2012) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00622.x · Cited by 48
On behalf of a bi-level account of trust
Carter, J. A. (2019) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01311-2 · Cited by 48
Virtue epistemology and the acquisition of knowledge
Pritchard, D. (2005) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869790500219513 · Cited by 48
Self-citationMoral understanding and knowledge
Riaz, A. (2014) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0328-6 · Cited by 47
The Nature and Normativity of Defeat
Kelp, C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009161022 · Cited by 46
DEFINING KNOWLEDGE IN TERMS OF BELIEF: THE MODAL LOGIC PERSPECTIVE
Halpern, J. Y., Samet, D., & Segev, E. (2009) · The Review of Symbolic Logic · doi:10.1017/s1755020309990141 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Pritchard, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pritchard, Duncan
- ORCID
- Pritchard, Duncan
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2005-03-10
- OpenAlex
- W4212874497
- Cited by
- 874
- References
- 192
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 37.39
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic luck, knowledge, luck, skepticism, epistemic justification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review